Re: Test for sra-sdk

2018-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Liubov, On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:01:21PM +0300, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > I made an effort to understand the cause of the failure, but to no vain. > > I > > > need to leave it till tomorrow. > > > I have finally succeded in building sra-sdk. Even though the error I wrote > about is sti

Re: Digressions (Re: Bio-Linux 9)

2018-07-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:26:32AM +0100, Tony Travis a écrit : > On 24/06/18 01:21, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > Very much agreed. I see how bioconda is slowly overtaking us, just by > > providing an essential feature: the ability to install software via a > > package manager without having to

Re: Maintain medicalterms on Salsa in Debian Med team

2018-07-05 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 5. Juli 2018 21:53:34 MESZ schrieb Andreas Tille : >Hi Tobias, > >I'm working down the list of packages that are mentioned on Debian Med >Blends tasks. This is the case for your medicalterms package. Would >you mind if I would take this over into Debian Med team maintenance on >Salsa? > >Kind

Maintain medicalterms on Salsa in Debian Med team

2018-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tobias, I'm working down the list of packages that are mentioned on Debian Med Blends tasks. This is the case for your medicalterms package. Would you mind if I would take this over into Debian Med team maintenance on Salsa? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Test for sra-sdk

2018-07-05 Thread Liubov Chuprikova
Hi Andreas, On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 at 17:35 Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > > Mmm... After upgrading to testing I cannot reproduce the build. It fails > > with the following message: > > ... > > ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so

Re: dawg tests failing

2018-07-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:01:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've used the tests provided with dawg to run it at package build time > as well as autopkgtest. Unfortunately the test fails. Could anybody > who is comfortable with the program itself evaluate this please. I stumbled again upon t

Re: [Debichem-devel] Rasmol needs severe contribution to stay in Debian

2018-07-05 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:59:01PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > the bug log of #790196[1] shows that rasmol in its current state will > not be distributable with Buster. Upstream is dead so if we want to > keep it in Debian we have the option: > >1) Port it to Gtk+ 3 (see porting guide