> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:00PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> >
> > At some point, I wondered if it would be possible to get
> > RepeatMasker into "non-free", and having VirusSeeker into
> > "contrib" then, but I'm not sure that this is legally doable
> > since VirusSeeker is GPL.
Le Thu,
Hi Étienne,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:24:00PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I've been quietly chiseling the packaging of virusseeker-virome,
> but I missed the proper RepeatMasker dependency in the initial
> list; Debian provides a few packages related to that software,
> and I mistakenly
Hi again,
Le 07/05/2020 à 16:26, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I also
>> think that observing autobuilders and possibly fix issues there in a
>> subsequent upload with your additional changes could be a good idea.
>
> As expected
Hi Everyone,
I've been quietly chiseling the packaging of virusseeker-virome,
but I missed the proper RepeatMasker dependency in the initial
list; Debian provides a few packages related to that software,
and I mistakenly thought it was available already. For
reference, it is the software
Hi Mo,
Mo Zhou, on 2020-05-07 14:15:15 +:
> [[[ ROCm flavor of DL frameworks ]]]
>
> I still don't know how on earth can the ROCm software stack work with
> the opensource `amdkfd` kernel driver (debian has already enabled that
> driver for our kernel packages) instead of the proprietary
Andreas Tille writes:
> Just want to repeat that I currently have no spare cycles for this.
Understood.
> Do you want to express we should package ncbi-vdb Git HEAD rather than
> a release tarball?
No, I meant that the work in progress on salsa, based on an existing
release tarball, just
Hi Aaron,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:32:09AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > H, I'm not sure whether vdb came with the original. I remember I
> > had to patch some stuff (specifically droping the 'vbd_' prefix). But
> > I do not remember and I have no spare
Hi Rebecca,
I have completely forgot the threads I opened in the past.
However, the cuDNN eula had been revised many times since the last
discussion. The latest revision was made on Nov 2019.
That means a re-evaluation is needed.
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer
Previous discussions:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862524
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887728
Hi Andreas,
Le 07/05/2020 à 16:26, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I also
>> think that observing autobuilders and possibly fix issues there in a
>> subsequent upload with your additional changes could be a good idea.
>
> As expected
Hello guys,
I mentioned cudnn in the other mail about my "plans for deep learning
frameworks". In this separate mail I'm talking about the licensing issue
about cudnn, the most important CUDA library for neural networks.
https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/sdk/cudnn-sla/index.html
Do you have
Steffen Möller writes:
> This ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/executables/igblast/release/1.15.0/ is
> where I got the source tree. It is not the case that igblast also occurs
> elsewhere, say together with the regular NCBI tools, and I am not aware
> of it.
ncbi-blast+ and ncbi-igblast are both
Hi Science and Med Team,
I maintain lots of packages related to deep learning and machine
learning, but I think I'm reaching an upperbound. So I'm clearly stating
my future plans about deep learning packages for Debian, lest potential
contributors hesitate to step in and help.
Med team has been
Andreas Tille writes:
> H, I'm not sure whether vdb came with the original. I remember I
> had to patch some stuff (specifically droping the 'vbd_' prefix). But
> I do not remember and I have no spare cycles currently to dive into
> this.
The git HEAD of ncbi-vdb looks mostly good to go
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I also
> think that observing autobuilders and possibly fix issues there in a
> subsequent upload with your additional changes could be a good idea.
As expected there is some more work to do which escaped my sponsors
view: See bug
My thanks to both of you! Please feel free to copy me on future
requests involving ncbi-entrez-direct, since I don't follow this list
closely. (Likewise for ncbi-tools6, though that doesn't need much
attention nowadays, and ncbi-blast+, though Olivier's also familiar with
that package and has
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:16:07AM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Andreas, I have just seen you uploaded my commits of libsis-jhdf5-java
> to unstable, thanks for that!
>
> I had not written to ask for it as I intended to do further changes
> before the upload (the script h5ar in
Hi Andreas and Gilles,
Andreas, I have just seen you uploaded my commits of libsis-jhdf5-java
to unstable, thanks for that!
I had not written to ask for it as I intended to do further changes
before the upload (the script h5ar in /usr/bin should be removed or
another jar should be compiled, as
18 matches
Mail list logo
