Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Ok I think I understand the problem, vtk was updated in between (last Friday). I still have vtk 9.0 and you guys have 9.1. :( One more patch to go ! ^^ I'll update my pbuilder image and fix this today. Sorry for that. :/ *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France &

Re: 20 years of Debian Med list :-) and suggested sprint date

Dear all, Le 24/01/2022 à 16:09, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi folks, on Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:59:11 +0100 the first mail to this list was sent[1]. So somehow we can celebrate some anniversary. :-) Great :-) Happy to celebrate this! Since 11 years we are doing team sprints - preferably face

Re: [Request for review] plast

January 25, 2022 12:24 AM, "Andreas Tille" wrote: > Thanks a lot for working on this Thanks for uploading! > PS: Another package in need of pcre3 -> pcre2 migration is pftools. > IMHO we should rewrite its test first (which is needed due to new > upstream way to run test and do the pcre-rewrite

Porting pftools to pcre2

Hi Philipp/Thierry pftools (build-)depends on the old, obsolete PCRE3 libraries (i.e. libpcre3-dev). This has been end of life for a while now, and upstream does not intend to fix any further bugs in it. Corresponding bug report #102 has been filed in debian, and I have uploaded pftools w/o

Re: [Request for review] plast

Hi Nilesh, Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:51:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > I have attempted to port plast to pcre2 for fixing up #91 > But since I have not used pcre2 myself earlier, I am unsure whether my patch > is > sensible enough. > > Could someone please do a review? > Andreas,

[Request for review] plast

Hi, I have attempted to port plast to pcre2 for fixing up #91 But since I have not used pcre2 myself earlier, I am unsure whether my patch is sensible enough. Could someone please do a review? Andreas, since you ported 'src:phast' to fix the one-million'th bug, could you please take a look

Re: 20 years of Debian Med list :-) and suggested sprint date

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2022-01-24: > Hi folks, > > on Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:59:11 +0100 the first mail to this list was > sent[1]. So somehow we can celebrate some anniversary. :-) Nice, Happy Anniversary then! :) > Since 11 years we are doing team sprints - preferably face to face >

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

On 1/24/22 10:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:53:13PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? Its definitely not testing since I never use a testing chroot

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:53:13PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault: > Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last > friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? Its definitely not testing since I never use a testing chroot for my pbuilder. May be somebody else can

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Well this is weird, I also built with pbuilder with sid (chroot updated last friday). Is it maybe testing on your side? *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT* Director of Software Development IRCAD France & IRCAD Africa flavien.brida...@ircad.fr Tél. : +33 (0)3 88

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi, I have no idea why salsa-ci fails unpacking sight. Thus I can't verify my issue to build the package on Salsa. In any case I get something like ... /build/sight-21.0.0/libs/core/core/tools/Dispatcher.hpp:180:30: recursively required from 'static void

Re: 20 years of Debian Med list :-) and suggested sprint date

Hi Nilesh, Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 08:46:11PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > > https://app.element.io/#/room/#_oftc_#debian-ftp:matrix.org > > Correct link: https://app.element.io/#/room/#debian-med:matrix.org > > The above link is for ftp IRC channel. Ups, thanks a lot for watching me!

Re: 20 years of Debian Med list :-) and suggested sprint date

On 1/24/22 8:39 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi folks, on Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:59:11 +0100 the first mail to this list was sent[1]. So somehow we can celebrate some anniversary. :-) Yay! :) https://app.element.io/#/room/#_oftc_#debian-ftp:matrix.org Correct link:

20 years of Debian Med list :-) and suggested sprint date

Hi folks, on Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:59:11 +0100 the first mail to this list was sent[1]. So somehow we can celebrate some anniversary. :-) Since 11 years we are doing team sprints - preferably face to face but last year it was not possible and thus we did it online. Same seems to be true for this

Re: [Help] librostlab-blast fails its autopkgtest with C++ issue

Andreas Tille writes: > However, what I do not understand is that the build of > librg-blast-parser-perl remains on failing[1] (versioned Build-Depends on > fixed librostlab-blast0-dev was set): Looks like fallout from a clash between Perl headers' definition of YYEMPTY as a macro and Rost Lab

Re: libcifpp transition

"Maarten L. Hekkelman" writes: > The Config file was no longer needed thanks to the switch to > cmake. The API should be roughly the same. It might have been helpful to leave a stub in place, perhaps with a deprecation warning; AFAICT, there are only a few reverse dependencies, but they all use

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]

Hi Andreas, Well, there was no answer from ITK Uploaders here, but I filled a bug as you recommended. I also added a patch to temporarily disable the guilty filter and fix the link stage, this builds fine on my side. Please confirm this is ok for you. Thanks as always for your time. :)

Re: libcifpp transition

Hi Maarten, On 2022-01-24 12:23, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Op 16-01-2022 om 09:47 schreef Andrius Merkys: >> libcifpp 2.0.4-1 has just been accepted to experimental (yay!). This >> means now we have to carry out its transition [1] (libcifpp1 -> >> libcifpp2). >> >> I see you have in the

Re: [Help] librostlab-blast fails its autopkgtest with C++ issue

Hi Aaron, Am Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 04:26:20PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko: > > Please try adjusting the test script to list parseblast.cpp ahead of the > -l flags; now that --as-needed is in effect by default, the linker > otherwise discards the libraries as not needed at the time of their >