Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2022-02-03 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi again, Le 03/02/2022 à 22:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:42:40PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: Yes, just before looking at king/libpdfbox-graphics2d-java I was updating snpeff and seeing if I could turn some unit tests into autopkgtests -- and I trust I can, this is

Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2022-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:42:40PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > > Yes, just before looking at king/libpdfbox-graphics2d-java I was updating > snpeff and seeing if I could turn some unit tests into autopkgtests -- and I > trust I can, this is my current task. Fine. > So if you think putting

Re: Bug#1004498: RFP: toml11 -- C++11 (or later) header-only toml parser/encoder

2022-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:51:33PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > @Andreas, can you link here to a recent packaging tutorial of yours, using > gbp? https://laotzu.ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2021/DebConf21/debconf21-142-live-packaging-workshop.webm :-) >+ Maintainer field

Re: Bug#1004498: RFP: toml11 -- C++11 (or later) header-only toml parser/encoder

2022-02-03 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:50:39PM +, Lance Lin wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Wednesday, February 2nd, 2022 at 9:33 PM, Nilesh Patra > wrote: > Ok, I've tested the package and the only warning is an improbable bug number. > However, it is the correct bug number. I do not see that problem;

Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2022-02-03 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 03/02/2022 à 10:31, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi, Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:49:32PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: I did the upload -- I agree autopkgtests would be valuable, still. Yet I remember the tests I did when designing the package last Spring, and I feel providing a

Re: Bug#1004498: RFP: toml11 -- C++11 (or later) header-only toml parser/encoder

2022-02-03 Thread Lance Lin
Hi Nilesh, On Wednesday, February 2nd, 2022 at 9:33 PM, Nilesh patranil...@debian.org wrote: > The following contents to cont...@bugs.debian.org should do the trick: > retitle 1004498 ITP: > merge 1004498 > thanks Thanks, I've done this. This was very helpful and I'll keep it in mind for the

New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

2022-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:49:32PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet: > I did the upload -- I agree autopkgtests would be valuable, still. Yet I > remember the tests I did when designing the package last Spring, and I feel > providing a dataset is necessary for even a basic use of snpeff, which, I >