Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental

Andreas Tille, on 2023-07-12: > Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Pseudo-excuses for experimental only caught an arm64 issue in > > python-bcbio-gff. Migration to biopython 1.81 should be pretty > > painless. > > Cool. Thanks a lot Not sure why this was

GATK

Hi Pierre, I was wondering whether we might be able to package GATK for the next release. I've just fixed the watch file in Git. It would be great if you could have a look once you might find some spare cycles. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

[Help] Could someone please have a look at gmap build failure

Hi, I admit I'm bad in such hardware internals that seem to break the build of gmap: intersect-uint2.c:409:21: error: incompatible types when initializing type '__m128i' using type 'int' 409 | __m128i p = _mm_shuffle_epi8(v_a, * (__m128i *) &(shuffle_mask16[r*16])); |

Re: Unable to find source code for pbsv which would be helpful for cutesv autopkgtest

Hi Andreas, Unfortunately the upstream repository of pbsv does not contain any code and the issue tracker to contact upstream is deactivated. Any idea how to get the pbsv code? It looks like they are not distributing the code :/ There is a binary in the release section of the GitHub project

Unable to find source code for pbsv which would be helpful for cutesv autopkgtest

Hi, I considered the benchmark for cutesv[1] a good resource to write an autopkgtest. Thus I added it as a script[2] and tried to package pbsv[3] which is used by this script. Unfortunately the upstream repository of pbsv does not contain any code and the issue tracker to contact upstream is

Re: biopython 1.81 in experimental

Am Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:56:30AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > Étienne Mollier, on 2023-07-10: > > In any case, thanks for the offer, build of 1.81 for amd64 and a > > couple of other architectures concluded[1], and experimental > > pseudo-excuses[2] are ready to run (and they already caught