Steve M. Robbins writes (Re: Status of uw-prism packaging for Debian):
My guess is that the legality of distribution hinges on how the software is
represented. For example, [1] defines device as:
any article, instrument, apparatus or contrivance, including any
component, part
Charles Plessy writes (Non-copyrightable work with non-free license.):
in at least two of my packages, bioperl and emboss, the test suite contains
protein sequence files from the UniProt database, which is distributed under
the non-free CC Attribution-NoDerivs license. Through a private
2 matches
Mail list logo
