Re: Issue about mutual dependencies for aparapi

2020-06-05 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hello, Le 04/06/2020 à 22:36, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Mechtilde wrote: > >> This is an outdated information. You can collect all source tar.gz >> together in to one orig.tar.xz. In the d/gbp.conf you configure a > > DON’T DO THAT. > > MUTs (multi-origtgz) were invented

Issue about mutual dependencies for aparapi

2020-06-04 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hello everyone, I am currently beginning packaging aparapi, which is a Java API to execute Java code on a GPU. In Debian Med, we need it as dependency of the dependency apfloat of SnpEff. This package relies on a JNI (native code) package which the same upstream develops as aparapi-native. Yet

Re: Maintaining non-med packages in the team only to satisfy dependencies

2020-05-30 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 30/05/2020 à 07:51, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:48:39PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: >> >> Lastly I have begun packaging Java software needed as dependencies of >> snpeff, that we would need in Debian Me

Maintaining non-med packages in the team only to satisfy dependencies

2020-05-29 Thread Pierre Gruet
Dear all, Lastly I have begun packaging Java software needed as dependencies of snpeff, that we would need in Debian Med as it is related to genes and proteins. I have thus worked on a Java library related to cdf, pdf and random variates generation: libdistlib-java. It is currently in NEW. Now

Re: RFS : libdistlib-java

2020-05-26 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 25/05/2020 à 23:12, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:47:58PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: >> I have packaged libdistlib-java, which is a Java implementation of >> several cdf, pdf, quantile and simulation functions from R,

RFS : libdistlib-java

2020-05-25 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi, I have packaged libdistlib-java, which is a Java implementation of several cdf, pdf, quantile and simulation functions from R, originally written in C. This was announced in ITP bug #961158. Would it be possible to have a review? It would be precious, as this is my first initial packaging!

Bug#961158: ITP: distlib -- Java library of statistical distribution functions

2020-05-20 Thread Pierre Gruet
Control: retitle -1 ITP: libdistlib-java -- Java library of statistical distribution functions Hi Scott and Andreas, Le 21/05/2020 à 06:44, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > On Thursday, May 21, 2020 12:08:44 AM EDT Andreas Tille wrote: >> At least the name of the binary package should be >> >>

Bug#961158: ITP: distlib -- Java library of statistical distribution functions

2020-05-20 Thread Pierre Gruet
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian-med project * Package name: distlib Version : 0.9.1 Upstream Author : Peter N. Steinmetz * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/statdistlib * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-12 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 08/05/2020 à 22:51, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > If you think you might be able to care for the h5ar binary issue in the > next couple of days I would delay the upload to fix the RC bug. I guess > this will not have any practical drawback if the propagation of this > package to

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-09 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 08/05/2020 à 22:51, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: >> >> Absolutely. This is part of the complementary tasks I was planning to do >> (my Salsa push of yesterday was on

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-08 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 08/05/2020 à 22:05, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > Very nice. Thanks a lot for your work. I've built and installed the > package. When noticing that there is no manpage for h5ar I intended to > check whether it might be cheap to create one via help2man. However, > this ended up

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-07 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi again, Le 07/05/2020 à 16:26, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I also >> think that observing autobuilders and possibly fix issues there in a >> subsequent upload with your additional changes could be a good idea. > > As expected

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-07 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 07/05/2020 à 16:26, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:43:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I also >> think that observing autobuilders and possibly fix issues there in a >> subsequent upload with your additional changes could be a good idea. > > As expected

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-05-07 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas and Gilles, Andreas, I have just seen you uploaded my commits of libsis-jhdf5-java to unstable, thanks for that! I had not written to ask for it as I intended to do further changes before the upload (the script h5ar in /usr/bin should be removed or another jar should be compiled, as

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-04-30 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Gilles, Le 01/05/2020 à 01:12, Gilles Filippini a écrit : > Pierre Gruet a écrit le 30/04/2020 à 23:45 : >> Thanks for looking at the issue and proposing a fix. It is very helpful! >> I will thus look at it and investigate further the failures that remain. > > This packa

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-04-30 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hello Gilles, Le 30/04/2020 à 23:17, Gilles Filippini a écrit : >>> >>> Thanks for checking; I had also seen that these tests did not run, this will >>> have to be fixed. More important is the fact that I have put and arranged >>> the piece of code of dh_auto_test override into a test in >>>

Re: Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-04-30 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Gilles, Le 29/04/2020 à 17:53, Gilles Filippini a écrit : > Andreas Tille a écrit le 29/04/2020 à 17:36 : >> Hi Gilles, >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:10:38PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: >>> >>> I've cloned the git repo and attempted a build. But the dh_auto_test >>> part doesn't execute

Packaging libsis-jhdf5-java -- help needed

2020-04-28 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi everyone, I have been trying to package libsis-jhdf5-java, after Andreas imported the last upstream version. This package builds a java package with a .jar file and a jni package with native code used by the .jar. I have been able to: - refresh patches; - get rid of the private header

Re: RFS : new upstream version of jebl2

2020-04-25 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 25/04/2020 à 11:20, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi again, > > perhaps also getting > >https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libsis-jhdf5-java > > done would be helpful. I've pushed latest upstream but did not > found the time to update the old patches to the new version. >

Re: RFS : new upstream version of jebl2

2020-04-24 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 24/04/2020 à 22:34, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > thanks a lot for your work. I usually would leave the commit ID inside > the version number (so 0.1+git20190308.a98448e) since this would silence > the new upstream available check - but I guess you thought about this >

RFS : new upstream version of jebl2

2020-04-24 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi, I have packaged the new upstream version of jebl2 and made various changes. Now the packaging is in Salsa [1], could someone please check and upload it when time permits? The changes are * New upstream version 0.1+git20190308 * Deleting now useless patch source_8.patch * Bumping

Re: sumatra uploaded using Debian packaged sumalibs

2020-04-20 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 20/04/2020 à 13:00, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:29:04AM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: >> I have just seen that sumalibs has successfully entered unstable and that >> the automatic piuparts warnings have disappeared from i

Re: sumatra uploaded using Debian packaged sumalibs

2020-04-20 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 14/04/2020 à 18:53, Andreas Tille a écrit : >> >> If you have time, I would appreciate a review of the three packages, which >> are in their three Salsa repositories. >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sumaclust/ >> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sumatra >>

Re: [RFS] Bug fixed in uc-echo

2020-04-17 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Nilesh and Andreas, Le 17/04/2020 à 19:21, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, 22:44 Pierre Gruet, <mailto:pgtdeb...@free.fr>> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have prepared an upload for the package uc-echo, of which autopkgtest &g

[RFS] Bug fixed in uc-echo

2020-04-17 Thread Pierre Gruet
Dear all, I have prepared an upload for the package uc-echo, of which autopkgtest was failing on arm64 due to a (by default unsigned) char type being used to store negative integer values. I will forward this fix to upstream. The package is in its Salsa repository [1]. Thanks in advance for

Re: sumatra uploaded using Debian packaged sumalibs

2020-04-14 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 09/04/2020 à 23:01, Andreas Tille a écrit : >> >> My question is: as I understand /4.13 Embedded code copies/ in the Debian >> policy, sumatra and sumaclust should use the libs in sumalibs to build, but >> the code of those libs that is duplicated inside sumaclust should remain >>

Re: sumatra uploaded using Debian packaged sumalibs

2020-04-09 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 09/04/2020 à 14:45, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > > as you might have noticed the Debian package for sumalibs was just > accepted. I've now built sumatra against this lib. I'd happily leave > the maintenance of all suma* packages to you. Yes, I noticed that sumalibs

Re: RFS: sumaclust with autopkgtest

2020-04-04 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi again, Le 04/04/2020 à 10:14, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > I try to put high priority on newcomer contributions so I just take > my time for a review. I can confirm that the tests are passing and > thus we could upload the package as is. Thanks a lot for the quick review! > There is some

RFS: sumaclust with autopkgtest

2020-04-04 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi, I have worked on sumaclust and pushed it on salsa [0] with version ``unreleased''. Lines have been suppressed in the last patch because upstream has made the necessary changes so that sumaclust builds. I have also provided autopkgtests, which check the executable works fine in a few simple

Re: Your packaging of sumaclust today

2020-04-04 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andreas, Le 03/04/2020 à 22:26, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > I tried with a new paragraph at the beginning of "How to Contribute". > Feel free to enhance that text! I think this paragraph clarifies things a lot. Having explained rules this way, there should be less hesitations. > > BTW,

Re: Your packaging of sumaclust today

2020-04-02 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi again, Le 02/04/2020 à 10:28, Andreas Tille a écrit : > >> If I may add something: having read the policy some days ago, I feel it >> lacks a kind of ``general habits'' section, like what you explained >> above: is it casual/rude to begin working on a package that already has >> uploaders who

Re: Your packaging of sumaclust today

2020-04-02 Thread Pierre Gruet
ian Med mailing list and > would be really happy if you would answer there. No problem about that, thanks for letting me know. Please believe I did not intend to hide things, but only to reduce noise. Next time I shall use the mailing list. > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:30:42PM +0200, P

<    1   2   3