Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emanuele. Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:16:16PM +0100 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > I've uploaded a NMU to DELAYED/2: https://bugs.debian.org/1067147 Thanks a lot for your attempt to help. In principle we have a team wide low threshold NMU - so undelayed NMUs are fine. The kind of race condition

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Andreas, On 2024-03-19 10:40, Andreas Tille wrote: > Since you all pinged that bug we now have another 4 weeks of time before > anything gets removed from testing. So we just need to bear the noise > from testing removal warnings of quite some packages (which I'd love to > get rid of thus

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, sorry, I did not checked the situation. Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Testing removals are happening automatically if some RC bug exists > for a certain time without pinging. Just writing some additional > information to the bug in question would

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:52:49AM +0100 schrieb Jörg Riesmeier: > Dear all, > > > Indeed, and there is a simple fix too, which has been uploaded to > > experimental only so far: > > yes, there is a simple fix (that disables the error), but there is also a > more fundamental fix that

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sébastien, Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:44:04AM +0100 schrieb Sébastien Jodogne: > > > > > > On 2024-03-19 06:24, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > > > Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to > > > > medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. To be

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Jörg Riesmeier
Dear all, > Indeed, and there is a simple fix too, which has been uploaded to > experimental only so far: yes, there is a simple fix (that disables the error), but there is also a more fundamental fix that (hopefully) solves the issue at its core:

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Dear Emmanuele and Mathieu, On 3/19/24 08:51, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:44 AM Emanuele Rocca wrote: Hi, On 2024-03-19 06:24, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to medical imaging have just disappeared from

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:44 AM Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2024-03-19 06:24, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > > Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to > > medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. > > > > But, if I correctly understand #1060104,

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-03-19 06:24, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to > medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. > > But, if I correctly understand #1060104, it is specific to one single > platform (armel). Indeed, and

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Dear all, Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. But, if I correctly understand #1060104, it is specific to one single platform (armel). My question is: Rather than penalizing all platforms (including

Re: Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Sébastien Jodogne
Dear all, Because of bug #1060104, a large majority of the packages related to medical imaging have just disappeared from Debian Unstable. But, if I correctly understand #1060104, it is specific to one single platform (armel). My question is: Rather than penalizing all platforms (including