On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002),
I guess the question really is twofold:
1. Are there any patches to 1.32 in the VTK tree?
On 2011/8/28 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002),
I guess the question really is twofold:
1. Are there
Hi,
As Mathieu says:
As said previously, I believe #506992 is starting to block other
packages, so it would be nice to make some progress on this.
Indeed. So I propose to simply add overrides for both embedded
libraries. These libraries have not been a problem for the last 11
years that
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in
ftgl
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
What are the differences between the VTK version of these
libraries and their respective upstream version?
VTK ships a convenient FTGL 1.32 version (April 23 2002), while debian
archive contains 2.1.3 since 2008-05-03
The
On 2011/8/23 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
with the ftgl patch. For some reason
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:34 AM, D. Barbier bou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011/8/23 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:18:04AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
with the
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.
All the best,
--
Michael Schutte | michi@{uiae.at,debian.org}
Innsbruck, Austria| happily
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
For the record, the updated package was rejected due to #638883.
Uhmmm. :-(
IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:22:54PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
I just uploaded vtk to DELAYED/0.
For the record, the updated package was rejected due to
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are
some changes. I would think handling this apropriately and overriding
the ftgl library with the (not so good) reason to push foreward this
package to be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Michael Schutte mi...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:46:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
IMHO it is quite straightforeward to verify sqlite whether there are
some changes. I would think handling this apropriately and overriding
the ftgl
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37:05PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am fairly confident with the sqlite patch. I am a lot less confident
with the ftgl patch. For some reason FTLibrary.h is not installed in
ftgl installation but seems to be used by VTK internals.
What are the differences
14 matches
Mail list logo
