On 01/05/2012 02:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:12:22PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
>> With this overrides one can built and clean package multiple times and
>> dpkg-source wouldn't complain about changed source .
>>
> This is a perfectly wanted goal, however
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:12:22PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> With this overrides one can built and clean package multiple times and
> dpkg-source wouldn't complain about changed source .
This is a perfectly wanted goal, however, this is not related to the
overrides you used. I never used
Hi All ,
On 01/05/2012 11:20 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:07:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
>> I had a short look into tophat and I wonder why cou need to override the
>> clean targets at all. This looks hackish and might be the cause of your
>> trouble. Usuall
On 01/05/2012 10:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:09:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>> The problem with cufflinks, and probably tophat, was that the clean target is
>> un-applying the patches, but the binary target, which is implicitely passed
>> to
>> dh, does not
Le Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:07:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> I had a short look into tophat and I wonder why cou need to override the
> clean targets at all. This looks hackish and might be the cause of your
> trouble. Usually source format 3.0 (quilt) cares for all you need and
> there
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:09:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The problem with cufflinks, and probably tophat, was that the clean target is
> un-applying the patches, but the binary target, which is implicitely passed to
> dh, does not depend on a target that applies the patch. For local build
Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:07:29PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>
> The same thing is happening with the Tophat package Alex just uploaded:
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/88998061/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.tophat_1.3.3-1~oneiric1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>
> Can you look into it? Should I jus
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:22:05PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>>
>> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/88726220/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.cufflinks_1.2.1-1~oneiric1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>>
>> I think I can see the problem, on that log I
Le Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:22:05PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/88726220/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.cufflinks_1.2.1-1~oneiric1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
>
> I think I can see the problem, on that log I see the package is been
> build without the patches, so the
Hi,
As a way of getting familiar with git-buildpackage and company. I have
been trying to clone several packages git repository and getting them
onto the PPA. I was able to do so for samtools, only for Oneiric as I
feel safer staying out of Lucid LTS until I gain more experience. I
created a new b
10 matches
Mail list logo
