On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:21:33AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
I have had an initial reply that the licensing issue will be raised
at the next UniProt consortium meeting, but in the meantime
they recommend downloading test files via the UniProt API
as part of a test suite, rather than bundling
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:21:33AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
I have had an initial reply that the licensing issue will be raised
at the next UniProt consortium meeting, but in the meantime
they recommend downloading test
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:18:57AM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
Seems to be a reasonable compromise specifically because you
can be qute sure to fetch up to date files.
Agreed. Of course one of the downsides is you might want to
also test old data (the formatting of data files from public
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have now emailed UniProt regarding the recent discussion on the
Debian-Med list about the UniProt CC BY-ND 3.0 licence stemming
from the inclusion of example data from UniProt in EMBOSS (and
potentially
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Could anybody contact UniProt whether this whole issue is not intended
but just an effect of not (yet) updated web page?
Kind regards
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
For one moment I was thinking that it is a correct thing to
release scientific data under a license which does not allow changing
the data because - hey, I do not want even myself change the result of
my
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Egon Willighagen
egon.willigha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
For one moment I was thinking that it is a correct thing to
release scientific data under a license which does not allow
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
...
I believe that UniProt should follow the revised advice of the Creative
Commons, and not use a CC licenses:
http://sciencecommons.org/resources/faq/databases/
Ironically the UniProt license page
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Could anybody contact UniProt whether this whole issue is not intended
but just an effect of not (yet) updated web page?
Kind regards
Andreas.
I've emailed a contact at UniProt to try and find out more, and in
Hello Andreas,
Le dimanche 31 juillet 2011 à 10:04 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
- Sylvestre, did you by chance saved the gobby
file because gobby.debian.net was switched off
I guess you saw that since then:
http://debblog.philkern.de/2011/08/debconf11-gobby-documents.html
As attachement,
[Please reply to debian-science mailing list - I'd like to widen the
audience a bit.]
Hi,
the somehow longish thread on the Debian Med mailing list starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2011/07/msg00146.html
makes me wondering what you are thinking about licensing scientific
data.
11 matches
Mail list logo