On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi, thank you for the comment.
I will stop to apply this patch until a better solution is found.
Charles, could you please give an update of the status of mummer package?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
Le Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:41:05AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi, thank you for the comment.
I will stop to apply this patch until a better solution is found.
Charles, could you please give an update of the status of
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely considered
user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not ready for upstream
in its current state.
Hi, thank you for the comment.
I will stop to
In 20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
considered user-friendly. However, it is executed poorly; it's not
ready for upstream in its current state.
In 200907281303.42301@iguanasuicide.net, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In 20090728163525.gc31...@an3as.eu, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:50:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
This patch is a good idea -- fixed length buffers are rarely
considered user-friendly. However,
In 20090704120642.gh6...@kunpuu.plessy.org, Charles Plessy wrote:
we have a patch in the Debian package mummer for which we lost origin and
detailed description. I would like to forward it upstream, but I would
prefer to know what it does before ;) Would somebody have a few minutes
to throw an
Dear Debian mentors,
we have a patch in the Debian package mummer for which we lost origin and
detailed description. I would like to forward it upstream, but I would prefer
to know what it does before ;) Would somebody have a few minutes to throw an
eye on it? It is in our SVN, and here is a
Hi Charles!
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charles Plessyple...@debian.org wrote:
we have a patch in the Debian package mummer for which we lost origin and
detailed description. I would like to forward it upstream, but I would prefer
to know what it does before ;) Would somebody have a few
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi Andreas and Steffen,
Taking a new upstream release as an opportunity, I have made a lot of
modifications to the mummer package. The current version in Debian relies
heavily on patches that are not documented and not always
Le Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/mummer/3.20-3/01sm_src_tigr.diff
See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2007/11/msg00045.html
Hi
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:11:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2007/11/msg00045.html
Hi Andreas,
I tried to google further and found no explication about the buffer overflow
that this patch is preventing. Do you have something useful in your mailbox?
Hi Andreas and Steffen,
Taking a new upstream release as an opportunity, I have made a lot of
modifications to the mummer package. The current version in Debian relies
heavily on patches that are not documented and not always suitable for
upstream. I converted the pacakge from CDBS to debhelper
12 matches
Mail list logo
