Re: support for software liberation (was: New version of fast5 does not build)

2017-01-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:03:28AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > >> See https://github.com/thegenemyers/DALIGNER/issues/35 > > > > I've added a comment. > > Thanks You are welcome. > > BTW, I could need similar help for contacting authors about freeing > > their code: > > > >

Re: support for software liberation (was: New version of fast5 does not build)

2017-01-22 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas, على الجمعـة 20 كانون الثاني 2017 ‫00:30، كتب Andreas Tille: > Hi Afif, > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:13:20PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> >> See https://github.com/thegenemyers/DALIGNER/issues/35 > > I've added a comment. > Thanks > BTW, I could need similar help for

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:13:20PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > See https://github.com/thegenemyers/DALIGNER/issues/35 I've added a comment. BTW, I could need similar help for contacting authors about freeing their code:

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-19 Thread Afif Elghraoui
على الخميس 19 كانون الثاني 2017 ‫05:14، كتب Andreas Tille: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:59:36PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >>> daligner/dazzdb/dascrubber probably have new upstream snapshots that need to be packaged. >>> >>> OK, these do not create any singnal on my dashboard

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:59:36PM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > >OK, seems like something we want to do later (I'd prefer a separate > >package for a separate download tarball since in the end this might be > >easier to maintain - but nothing to do here for the moment whatever we > >do). > > >

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-19 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas, On الأربعاء 18 كانون الثاني 2017 02:34, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Afif, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 01:33:55AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: I guess it should be not to hard to fix the clean target but I'm wondering whether you might intend to continue on this. This new version, if I

Autopkgtest for falcon (Was: New version of fast5 does not build)

2017-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Afif, > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 01:33:55AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > > > falcon's new release fails autopkgtest, which I have not gotten around to > > debugging, so I have not uploaded it. > > I'll have a

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 01:33:55AM -0800, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > > >I guess it should be not to hard to fix the clean target but I'm > >wondering whether you might intend to continue on this. > > This new version, if I remember correctly, has made the example program into > a

Re: New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-18 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Hi, Andreas, On الأربعاء 18 كانون الثاني 2017 00:50, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Afif, I'm currently trying to update all our packages to latest upstream (according to developers dashboard[1]) since January 25 might be the last one to get new versions inzo next stable release. I was stumbling

New version of fast5 does not build

2017-01-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Afif, I'm currently trying to update all our packages to latest upstream (according to developers dashboard[1]) since January 25 might be the last one to get new versions inzo next stable release. I was stumbling upon fast5 which you commited to Git. The Build fails with: I: pybuild