I still have a bit of a doubt that building will succeed in all
architectures; although it might just as well, though. Let's see.
so it is all good besides armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aghermannarch=armelver=0.5.1.1-1stamp=1327293393
clues?
--
if you get a chance and have some spare HDD space and cpu time left --
you could give a try and setup virtualized emulated armel box, e.g.
starting with squeeze images from
http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/armel/
and then upgrading them to sid (might end up being non trivial).
I think at
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:00:39 -0500
Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
so it is all good besides armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=aghermannarch=armelver=0.5.1.1-1stamp=1327293393
Looking at this:
../core/tunable.hh:261: confused by earlier errors, bailing
Hi Yaroslav,
Ok, autoreconf shadows are defeated now.
The winning move was to include autoconf-archive in Build-Depends (along
with dh-autoreconf, obviously, and append --with autoreconf in rules).
I could then safely remove all Makefile.in files from the original
installation tarball, plus
Ok, autoreconf shadows are defeated now.
congrats! thanks!
for the next uploads -- please make debian/changelog entries
informative -- primarily document changes which were done to the content
of debian/, e.g. in this case use of 'dh $@ --with autoreconf' so later
on it would be possible from
Hi Yaroslav,
I did it again, a new version. It's mostly bugfixes. The link to the
.dsc file is
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.5.1-1.dsc.
btw -- if you would have loved your sponsor, you would have dropped all
autotools pregenerated crap and re-generated
Hi Yaroslav,
Hi Andrei
I did it again, a new version. It's mostly bugfixes. The link to the
.dsc file is
http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.5.1-1.dsc.
well:
--- aghermann-0.5.0/gentoo/aghermann-0.5.1.ebuild 1969-12-31
19:00:00.0 -0500
+++
7 matches
Mail list logo
