Re: [med-svn] r9384 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm-initial/trunk/debian

2012-01-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: Just explaining my motivation - not insisting that this was correct: We are currently talking about / working on the initial package to bootstrap a real fid-gtm package. Yes, but I assumed that we only wanted to have one -initial package. So it

Re: [med-svn] r9384 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm-initial/trunk/debian

2012-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:00:08PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Yes, but I assumed that we only wanted to have one -initial package. So it should contain both bootstrap tar files for amd64 and i386. Depending on the architecture of the buildd only one is really used. Ahh, OK. But does it

Re: [med-svn] r9384 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm-initial/trunk/debian

2012-01-23 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: +# obtain build architecture to detect the right binary for installation I guess that is not correct. Some times ago Bhaskar explained to me that there are reasons to let the user decide whether the 32bit or 64bit version shall be installed on

Re: [med-svn] r9384 - trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm-initial/trunk/debian

2012-01-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:54:51PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: +# obtain build architecture to detect the right binary for installation I guess that is not correct. Some times ago Bhaskar explained to me that there are reasons to let the user decide whether the 32bit or 64bit version