Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:53:00PM +0100, chrysn wrote: > > The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to > python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the > privacy violations (JavsScript and badges in the documentation and some > web application

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread chrysn
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:45:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Will let you know when I'm through with those and all is pushed to > > alioth again. The current master passes build in a cowbuilder that has access to python3-ratelimiter, and lintian's only serious complaints are the privacy

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 03:35:53PM +0100, chrysn wrote: > I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and > possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder > to see which build dependencies popped up that are undeclared so far, > but I don't expect any

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-11 Thread chrysn
> The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in > the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look? I've got them all down locally; it'll need some cleaning up (and possibly upstreaming) of patches, and I have yet to run it in a pbuilder to see which build

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 03:22:33PM +0100, chrysn wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:18:42AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in > > the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look? > > I've started with the

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-10 Thread chrysn
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:18:42AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > The problem is that when trying to build this I get a lot of errors in > the build time tests. Is there any volunteer to have a look? I've started with the tests more or less at random, and the second seems to be promising to solve

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-10 Thread chrysn
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:18:34AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ping, could you please throw at least any ENOTIME error. We should get > at least *any* working snakemake out. If I get no response from you > I'll upload the old version with fixed build system and leave the work > to get the new

Re: Bug#878498: snakemake FTBFS with Python 3.6 as default

2017-12-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:49:57AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > I've upgraded snakemake in Git to latest upstream but its featuring the > > same issue. I'm pretty sure you Python people know a simple answer for > > this issue. > Did you see this part? > > > > The problem is the the