Hi Folks,
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:48:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
altogether -- I don't see anyone yet expressing desire to jump onto
packaging (yet), nor there is an RFP (request for
Hi Luis,
on pretty much unrelated to packaging topic: I think I haven't
found any public VCS for dicoogle -- I wonder if there is any publicly
available?
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Luis A. Bastiao Silva wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm new at this email list. I've seen that dicoogle has been discussed
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.comwrote:
Hi Luis,
on pretty much unrelated to packaging topic: I think I haven't
found any public VCS for dicoogle -- I wonder if there is any publicly
available?
Thanks for quickly reply. So can you
;-) It is not necessary for Debian packaging effort per se as long as
you distribute the source tarballs (which you do).
It is just me -- I thought to look into dicoogle, how active it is in
terms of development, what is the internal organization of the project
(versus source distribution which
Hi again,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.comwrote:
;-) It is not necessary for Debian packaging effort per se as long as
you distribute the source tarballs (which you do).
Fine. We will see if we can come up with a public repository. We've several
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Luis A. Bastiao Silva wrote:
Our development is�committers, although we accept external patches. Regard
the libraries that we are depending, you're right. We've a lot of external
dependences. We're thinking to migrate to maven to outsource
this�responsibility
6 matches
Mail list logo
