Re: Removal of mummy and activiz.net

Hi Gert, On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:22:06PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > considering that these two packages won't see any fixes, (they require > the abandoned gccxml), I guess that apart from tagging the related bugs > as wontfix (done), I also should request the removal of the packages.

aeskulap, was: Re: Removal of mummy and activiz.net

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:33:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > (This might give you an additional time slice to possibly > have a short look on aeskulap. ;-)) YES ! Please do ! That would help A LOT ! :-) Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA

Removal of mummy and activiz.net

Hi all, considering that these two packages won't see any fixes, (they require the abandoned gccxml), I guess that apart from tagging the related bugs as wontfix (done), I also should request the removal of the packages. What I'm wondering now is how this is done for a team packages? Since I