Hi Steffen,
I stumbled upon this old mail. While nobody has answered so far I'd
like to give some update.
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 21.10.17 10:11, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:08:49AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
Hello,
On 21.10.17 10:11, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:08:49AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> when reading this commit log: Should we package Bioconductor TFBSTools?
>>
>> This would need at least a hand full of Bioconductor depencencies but
>> usually it is quite straigh
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 05:11:19PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> my gut feeling is that we should better concentrate on packages more at
> the core of Bioconductor, or gaining tration to move towards the core,
> for example MultiAssayExperiment, unless we get a specific request.
Fine for me. I j
Le Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:08:49AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> when reading this commit log: Should we package Bioconductor TFBSTools?
>
> This would need at least a hand full of Bioconductor depencencies but
> usually it is quite straightforward and can be easily done via
>
> dh-ma
Hi,
when reading this commit log: Should we package Bioconductor TFBSTools?
This would need at least a hand full of Bioconductor depencencies but
usually it is quite straightforward and can be easily done via
dh-make-R --team med --test run-unit-test
plus editing d/copyright a bit.
If my
5 matches
Mail list logo
