Le Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:10:53AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
When looking briefly at the code seems the spacy package names
(ncbi-blast , feel , gtk 3.0, getfem ) will also end up
in the umegaya database itself because you are using $package as
key. Can you verify this?
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:55:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The names in packages-metadata should be source package names, and I have
improperly used binary package names when parsing the blends task files.
One more item to add the TODO list...
I found another instance (besides probably
Le Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:55:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The names in packages-metadata should be source package names, and I have
improperly used binary package names when parsing the blends task files.
One more
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:55:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The names in packages-metadata should be source package names, and I have
improperly used binary package names when parsing the blends task files.
One more item
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
What if you want to have different publication data for different binary
packages, or exclude some binary packages from publication data?
Point in case would be openbabel, where the python bindings had a
dedicated publication, or
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:30:59AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
All of this is complicated and will be un-necessary once I have corrected the
bugs that lead to created the bogus files. If you prefer, please just ping me
once you finished your corrections, and I will push the update
After
Le Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
After todays checkout at least those fixes I pushed yesterday where in. The
only thing I'm curious about is:
$ find packages-metadata -name *qtl.* | grep -v 'svn/'
packages-metadata/r/r-cran-qtl.upstream
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:55:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The files q/qtl.* are outdated and I can not see how we can make them
vanish.
Oops, that is a bug.
The names in packages-metadata should be source package names, and I have
improperly used binary package names when parsing
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:17:07PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I agree with your propositions, but I would like to remind that roughly you an
me contribute the most to the upstream files, so let's agree that we can
revert
changes in a later phase where we have extended feedback.
As far
Le Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:57:30PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I moved your suggested Definition of the Reference field to the Wiki and
added the keys of the mapping (basically leaving out the Reference-).
I would suggest to call Reference-key from the list of supported
fields. Is this
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:18:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Reference is not a field in the current specification. I think that this
illustrates well the current confusion about the format. In that sense, it is
not possible to answer to your question of what breaks by using nested
Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
So we should go on with specifying it and I guess with this specification you
mean describing it at
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
Hi Andreas,
I agree with your propositions, but I would like to remind that
Le Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I took the Reference field for granted because it was used heavily in
practice.
Hi Andreas,
Reference is not a field in the current specification. I think that this
illustrates well the current confusion about the format. In
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:41:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I did not have time to read the rest, but I just checked the Git repository
and
I do not see your changes.
Sorry, writing mail *and* commiting stuff made me forgetting `git push`. This
weak is a bit short on time ...
It seems
Hi Charles,
just a short notice because I was quite occupied today!
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:33:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
According to http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata, the two following
files would be equivalent:
---
Reference-PMID: 19854763
Contact: Manolo Gouy
Le Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I pushed the preliminary + untested code into
git://git.debian.org/git/users/plessy/umegaya.git
Hi Andreas,
I did not have time to read the rest, but I just checked the Git repository and
I do not see your changes. It
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:42:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
in the first round where I wrote the UDD importer you accepted the format I
proposed. Writing this importer by myself took me countless hours, as I did
not know Python programming, and as the handling of Unicode in the UDD was not
Hi again,
I am really frustrated. You pointed at problems, I worked to solve them, and
now you come again and again with the same story that the system is not
reliable. Please remember that 1) the bugs you report can be fixed and 2) no
program is ever prefect from the first release.
It is the
Hi Charles,
I'm very sorry that my work caused frustration on your side. This was
absolutely not intended. I strongly believed I would work on the same
goal as you and following your plan. Obviosely e-mails do not work
out as deescalation means and so I'm for the moment delaying my answer.
Le Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:04:49PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi Charles,
I'm very sorry that my work caused frustration on your side. This was
absolutely not intended. I strongly believed I would work on the same
goal as you and following your plan. Obviosely e-mails do not work
out
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:37:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I agreed to provide flat files in a way that they can be parsed by anybody,
because I agree that such a repository has some value, especially since it
includes the copyright files as well.
Fully ACK.
But for feeding the UDD with
Hi Andreas,
in the first round where I wrote the UDD importer you accepted the format I
proposed. Writing this importer by myself took me countless hours, as I did
not know Python programming, and as the handling of Unicode in the UDD was not
so intuitive. Then you found bugs and decided to
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:37:08AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that we need to discuss the general syntax of the file.
Initially, I thought it as limited to name: value fields like in Debian
control
data files. Then after adding many Reference-* fields, I found that syntax
boring
Just a short question regarding this job.
I followed quickly the mails regarding this task but what I'd like to
know is where will appear the bibtex/citation when everything is done?
Thanks
Olivier
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4
6F83 D3B9 5204 6335
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:33:29AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote:
Just a short question regarding this job.
I followed quickly the mails regarding this task but what I'd like to
know is where will appear the bibtex/citation when everything is done?
My main goal is to replace the citation
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:19:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
May be I'm doing some to strong simplification - I just wanted to save
time and kept it short. But as I said we can work on the collecting
upstream files completely independently from the task to import those
files into UDD.
Le Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:03:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I just want to let you know that I wrote some code to parse upstream
files stored in the proposed directory layout and move references into a
UDD table featuring a rank column - so at least we can store more than
one
Le Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:06:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
For adding a rank to the references, this may be a good idea, but how do you
propose to implement this in YAML ? Perhaps it would be simpler to keep
a single reference broken in YAML fields as it is now, and dump the rest in
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:06:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
On my side I made a first push to the collab-qa Subversion repository.
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/collab-qa/packages-metadata/
Great.
Still, I am disappointed that you ignore the rest of my work. I spent a lot
of
29 matches
Mail list logo
