Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:19:57PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > It builds for me as well. Lintian claims some JS without source in > >util/py_lib/seqan/dox/tpl/lib/ > > I'll see what I can do about this. > > I raised this with upstream in [1]. They seem to think that it is required for >

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-06 Thread Kevin Murray
Hi Andreas, On 16:55 06/08, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > It appears I have got SeqAn to build. Looks as though they changed the name > > of > > one of their seqan-specific cmake options. I fixed d/rules and the build > >

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:55:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > It appears I have got SeqAn to build. Looks as though they changed the name > > of > > one of their seqan-specific cmake options. I fixed d/rules and the build >

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Kevin, On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > It appears I have got SeqAn to build. Looks as though they changed the name of > one of their seqan-specific cmake options. I fixed d/rules and the build > appears to succeed. However the only machine I currently have

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-06 Thread Kevin Murray
Hi Andreas, It appears I have got SeqAn to build. Looks as though they changed the name of one of their seqan-specific cmake options. I fixed d/rules and the build appears to succeed. However the only machine I currently have access to that has sufficient RAM & disk space is running Ubuntu 14.04,

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:26:52AM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Did you push tags to git.d.o? upstream/2.2.0+dfsg is missing for me. Forgot to push --tags. Sorry, done now. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-04 Thread Kevin Murray
Hi Andreas, My apologies, this week is very busy. I've pulled the repo, and will try getting it to build. I'll push any commits I make immediately. It may still be worth asking debian-mentors, as A), I might not find a solution, and B), I might not get time to experiment with this fully. Sorry

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, the fact that nobody raised an idea might mean I should ask on debian-mentors for cmake help, right? Kind regards Andreas. On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:22:25PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:15:15PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > > is

Re: Status of seqan2

2016-08-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sascha, On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:15:15PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > is it correct to assume that packaging seqan2 version 2.2 instead of 2.1 > > is the right way to go and should I help doing so? > > Well, if I could make a wish, then I would say 2.2 for sure! I have a > half-ready

Status of SeqAn2 / planed upload of seqan-dev 1.4.2+dfsg (Was: Status of seqan)

2016-08-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Kevin, On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:52:54PM +1000, Kevin Murray wrote: > > There were many complex merge conflicts between master and upstream. It was > actually a lot easier to resolve than I expected. It's now ready for review. Hmmm, some time has passed - sorry for the delay. > However, it