Hi,
I somehow feel this is the right moment to let molphy die. This
non-free, non-maintained upstream piece of very old code just drained a
lot of my time to fix totally broken code. While arb rdepends from
molphy (actually provides its own copy with other problems) I would
patch arb in a way
Le Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:05:32AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I somehow feel this is the right moment to let molphy die. This
non-free, non-maintained upstream piece of very old code just drained a
lot of my time to fix totally broken code. While arb rdepends from
molphy (actually
not that I care, nor I would like to keep you guys busy... but indeed
announcing the intent somehow so it could reach users would be nice,
since according to popcon there are some people who at least have it
installed
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=molphy
it is in decline but at 40 ATM,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I support your choice. I think that it would be nice to mention it on Twitter
and the debian-med blog so that users can tell us if they really needed
molphy.
I (or any other volunteer) can also make a small news entry on our
4 matches
Mail list logo
