Hi John,
John Marshall, on 2021-01-25 11:28:33 +:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Sounds good. I think we should prefer this once the new version is
> > available.
>
> FYI bedtools 2.30.0 was released over the weekend.
Thanks for the notice, I had some spare cycles this afternoon to
inline
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Sounds good. I think we should prefer this once the new version is available.
FYI bedtools 2.30.0 was released over the weekend.
John
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:12:40PM +, John Marshall wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I do not fully understand why the htsutil binary should not stay in the
> > bedtools package
>
> If I were a Debian user who had installed the bedtools package, I would be
> confused by that package
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I do not fully understand why the htsutil binary should not stay in the
> bedtools package
If I were a Debian user who had installed the bedtools package, I would be
confused by that package creating a /usr/lib/bedtools directory -- because
bedtools does not have plugins
Hi John,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:43:01PM +, John Marshall wrote:
> Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > Technically speaking, the existing bedtools-test package moving
> > to Arch: any will need one instance per architecture, so growing
> > the size of the archive.
>
> That is true, and the test
Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Technically speaking, the existing bedtools-test package moving
> to Arch: any will need one instance per architecture, so growing
> the size of the archive.
That is true, and the test data is unfortunately quite large. One could put the
htsutil executable (and perhaps
Hi John,
John Marshall, on 2021-01-17 16:35:36 +:
> Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> > testing, so I pushed a fix[1].
>
> The problem being that the bedtools-test package's symlink to
> the htsutil executable located in the bedtools
Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> testing, so I pushed a fix[1].
The problem being that the bedtools-test package's symlink to the htsutil
executable located in the bedtools package is not adequately copied when the
test files are copied to
Hi Charles, Hi Juhani,
Thanks for your thoughts, I pushed the changes.
Charles Plessy, on 2021-01-17 21:45:52 +0900:
> Le Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Étienne Mollier a écrit :
> >
> > I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> > testing, so I pushed a fix[1].
Étienne Mollier kirjoitti 17.1.2021 klo 14.20:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze,
> I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing
> version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there are a few
Le Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Étienne Mollier a écrit :
>
> I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
> testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze,
> I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing
> version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there
Hi,
I noticed current bedtools 2.29.2+dfsg-5 fails to migrate to
testing, so I pushed a fix[1]. Since this is transition freeze,
I'm not 100% sure if it should be pushed, current Testing
version is 2.29.2+dfsg-3, and there are a few reverse
dependencies.
[1]
12 matches
Mail list logo
