Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most platforms explicitly unsupported

Le jeu. 4 févr. 2016 à 14:26, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most > platforms explicitly unsupported > Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:03:01 + > Resent-From: Andreas

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most platforms explicitly unsupported

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:29:26AM +, olivier sallou wrote: > > could someone possibly check on such an affected architecture after > > disabling the patches? If all else fails I would not mind just > > uploading with deactivated tests and thus throw it on the auto builders. > > > I have not

Ginkgo CADx free version, status?

Dear Carlos, on the Debian-med list we were discussion the current status of the program Ginkgo CADx in Debian, because it needs some work to be adapted to new versions of DCMTK (3.6.1) and VTK (6.2). Since no new free (as in LPGL-3) version was released since 2014 and since Metaemotion has

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most platforms explicitly unsupported

- Mail original - > De: "Andreas Tille" > À: debian-med@lists.debian.org > Envoyé: Mardi 16 Février 2016 13:06:48 > Objet: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most platforms > explicitly unsupported > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:29:26AM +,

Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?

Hi all, unfortunately Carlos was no longer valid, so I interchanged some messages with him on LinkedIn - in Spanish :) He told me that he actually mentioned on Debian-med that a fork would be a good idea at the time when Metaemotion was acquired by Nielsen. He also told me that there is no

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#813559: ngs-sdk: FTBFS: most platforms explicitly unsupported

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:03:22PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > I came to a similar conclusion but gave up in this cryptic configuration > > method. Any volunteer? > > I will when I have some time. > > I need to find first where are the different archs "name" vs archs supported > by

Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?

Hi Gert, thanks a lot for your investigation and work on this package! Andreas. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > Hi all, > > unfortunately Carlos was no longer valid, so I interchanged some > messages with him on LinkedIn - in Spanish :) > > He told me that he

Re: My sprint report (Was: Annual Debian Med sprint: 04.-07. February 2016 in Copenhagen)

On behalf of ELIXIR / DTU I'd like to say thanks to the Debian guys, had a real blast and it's a pleasure with such hard working people. A slight clarification (this is often mixed up): EDAM is a simple controlled vocabulary (for bio-topics, operations data and data formats). It is used to

New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

Dear all, the new upstream repo is now here: https://github.com/gerddie/ginkgocadx If anyone wants to join the development, you are _very_ welcome - especially someone with knowledge about the workflows this software is used for. In the next few days I will try to package and upload a

Aw: New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

User story #1: - patient comes into practice with DICOM-CD - doctor uses GinkgoCADx to display DICOM files from CDROM Karsten

Aw: New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

User story #2: - doctor reads DICOM files from patient provided DICOM CDROM - doctor sends studies to PACS server

Aw: New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

User story #3: - doctor uses Ginkgo CADx to search for studies of a given patient stored in a PACS server - doctor downloads and displays studies

Aw: New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

User story #4 - doctor display a range of studies downloaded from a PACS server - doctor burns selected studies onto a CDROM to give to the patient for referral to another doctor

Aw: New upstream repo: (was Re: Ginkgo CADx free version, status?)

User story #5 - doctor displays a DICOM study - doctor zooms/pans/rotates/flips image - doctor changes contrast of image - doctor returns to "original" display of image - doctor annotates interesting areas with - arrows - circles - ellipses - text - doctor saves annotations - doctor

It is out! Aw: Re: cwl - ok for me to document my progress on wiki.d.o?

Please see https://wiki.debian.org/CommonWorkflowLanguage which is some very bare bones Debian-tailored portal to the CWL, I tend to think. Please extend at leisure.   A question missing on that page may be: Q: How do I find a good workflow for my problem? Idea of an answer: The CWL per se