Re: python-biopython not moved to testing

On 11/30/2017 03:31 PM, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > On 11/30/2017 11:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:09:23PM +, olivier sallou wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I see that biopython has been patched to prevent removal, but it seems to >>> be stuck in unstable >>> >>> 20 days old

Ask for rebuild of python-biopython

Hi, package build of python-biopython failed during test step on last upload on mips64el [0] I tried to build the package via a chroot on eller.debian.org and faced no error, package could build succesfully. Could package be rebuilt to see if it is a transient or dependencie issue (between our

Re: CMake help needed to enable hdf5 for gatb-core (Was: [MoM] Re: gatb-core packaging)

[Switching back to list ... ] On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 06:43:00PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > I confirm that replacing with "hdf5/serial" in your patch works: > > > -#include > +#include I verified that this works as well and commited the corrected patch. > compilation fails later on on

Re: python-biopython not moved to testing

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 05:02:42PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > I just did a test on eller.debian.org with a mips64el sid chroot and all > tests passed.. > Maybe should only ask for a rebuild of package? Sure - seems promising. (I actually see no need to ask here. ;-) ) Kind regards

Re: Ask for rebuild of python-biopython

On 30/11/17 17:53, olivier sallou wrote: > Hi, > package build of python-biopython failed during test step on last upload on > mips64el [0] > > I tried to build the package via a chroot on eller.debian.org > and faced no error, package could build succesfully. > Could

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Hi Fabian, thanks for your comments. I'd really love if more people become involved in autopkgtests and teaching newcomers! On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:30:14PM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > One issue I have with DEP-8 (autopackagetest) is that it is unspecified > *what* shall be tested. Eg. how

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Hi Fabian, On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > > thanks for your comments. I'd really love if more people become > > involved in autopkgtests and teaching newcomers! > > I am also a newcomer with respect to autopackage tests. Even better. :-) I'll open several bugs

Re: figtree autopkgtest

On 30.11.2017 10:39, Andreas Tille wrote: >> GIF works just fine on my Ubuntu LTS‽ > > $ figtree -graphic GIF -width 320 -height 320 test.tree test.gif | head -n5 > > Argument, -graphic has a bad string value: GIF > > > FigTree v1.4.3, 2006-2016 > > > > What version of

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Hi Fabian, On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > On 30.11.2017 10:39, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> GIF works just fine on my Ubuntu LTS‽ > > > > $ figtree -graphic GIF -width 320 -height 320 test.tree test.gif | head -n5 > > > > Argument, -graphic has a bad string value:

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Ho, On 30.11.2017 10:07, Andreas Tille wrote: > thanks for your comments. I'd really love if more people become > involved in autopkgtests and teaching newcomers! I am also a newcomer with respect to autopackage tests. > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:30:14PM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: >> One

Re: python-biopython not moved to testing

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:09:23PM +, olivier sallou wrote: > Hi, > I see that biopython has been patched to prevent removal, but it seems to > be stuck in unstable > > 20 days old (needed 5 days) > missing build on mips64el: python-biopython, python3-biopython (from > 1.70+dfsg-2) > old

Re: CMake help needed to enable hdf5 for gatb-core (Was: [MoM] Re: gatb-core packaging)

On 11/30/2017 07:09 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Switching back to list ... ] > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 06:43:00PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> I confirm that replacing with "hdf5/serial" in your patch works: >> >> >> -#include >> +#include > I verified that this works as well and commited

Re: CMake help needed to enable hdf5 for gatb-core (Was: [MoM] Re: gatb-core packaging)

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:18:59PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > >> compilation fails later on on json.hpp, but this is an other issue > you removed, for copyright I think, the json.hhp (coming from thirdparty > dir). > It is used to manage json in gatb. The only json.hpp I found in debian >

python-biopython

Hi, after the rebuilt I asked on mips64el, package built with success. Issue was either an error with server, or a dependency updated in the meanwhile. I will test on a sparc64 debian machine as error (bus error) also seem machine related. If i can build successfully, I will ask to re-execute the

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Hi Andreas, On 30.11.2017 10:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Fabian Klötzl wrote: >> The output is a well rendered phylogeny. > > Yes, but may be the GIF format was droped for pretty good reasons > replaced by PNG without adapting the docs. The resulting PNG

December

Hi everybody, this time of the year has come again and in order to carry on a tradition (it is the seventh time this year), I want to remind everybody of our combined efforts to take care of some poor souls. The days are closing in, the year is drawing to an end and we should think of all

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Hi Andreas, On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: I'll open several bugs for missing tests soon which we can close in our advent bug squashing party (Thorsten?) yes, but don't forget the old poor souls :-). Thorsten

Re: python-biopython not moved to testing

On 11/30/2017 11:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:09:23PM +, olivier sallou wrote: >> Hi, >> I see that biopython has been patched to prevent removal, but it seems to >> be stuck in unstable >> >> 20 days old (needed 5 days) >> missing build on mips64el:

Re: figtree autopkgtest

Dear Andreas and Fabian wow that's pretty wonderful - thank you for all the great comments! Dear Andreas, yes - you are absolutely right, when i tested it in my local linux machine i had the second and third line (i.e the graphic outputs) commended out... So,i tested only the first line, saw that

Re: December

Hi everybody, its really that simple to close a bug which I'm doing here without a line of code closing my first bug in this mail after having checked that zstd has hit backports and adding "882244-d...@bugs.debian.org" to the list of receivers of this mail. Not all bugs are *that* simple to