Hi Lin,
I've uploaded a package based on your work for the autopkgtest
with this changelog:
Changes:
fsm-lite (1.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Lance Lin ]
* Add autopkgtest
Closes: #986201
.
[ Andreas Tille ]
* Ignore i386 in Salsa-CI since it is implicitly excluded by
On 12/21/21 9:00 PM, Pierre Gruet wrote:
On 21/12/2021 14:33, Lance Lin wrote:
Debian Medical Team,
I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of packages. Two of the packages (hinge, pique) require very large data sets to run their included examples.
The sizes are
Dear Andreas, dear Nilesh, dear all,
I would appreciate some extra scrutiny for
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparql
Please kindly upload if you consider this "ready-enough" or pass the
token back to me, please.
This https://www.disgenet.org/disgenet2r is why I (and Debian at
Hello Lance,
On 21/12/2021 14:33, Lance Lin wrote:
Debian Medical Team,
I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of packages.
Two of the packages (hinge, pique) require very large data sets to run their
included examples. The sizes are several GB. It also looks like
Debian Medical Team,
I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of packages.
Two of the packages (hinge, pique) require very large data sets to run their
included examples. The sizes are several GB. It also looks like they may be
graphical in nature.
Is it permissible
Hi,
Am Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:04:21PM +0530 schrieb Mayuresh:
> Reviving this[1] old thread after a gap of 1 year.
>
> Thanks to the thread this[2] open source implementation to interact with a
> dental RVG device got developed. As of my pausing this work it was
> possible to extract the X ray
Please go ahead - thank you both. If there is any particular action for
me to perform then please ping me, preferably with a respective tag in
the subject line.
Best
Steffen
On 19.12.21 12:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Nilesh and Steffen,
Am Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 01:36:50PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:17:02AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Given that you are programming in Python I'd recommend PIL to do some
> image processing. If you want to do some post-processing possibly
> ImageMagick is your friend.
Sure, that helps. I'll use either of these once I figure out
Hi Steffen,
Am Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 04:05:17PM +0100 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> I would appreciate some extra scrutiny for
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparql
>
> Please kindly upload if you consider this "ready-enough" or pass the
> token back to me, please.
Uploaded after
Andreas Tille writes:
> I've never seen this before and I wonder whether this is something
> I should be concerned about before uploading.
Yes, it looks like the build system is set up to produce "thin" archives
that can't stand on their own; please try patching the Makefile to drop
the T flag
Control: tags -1 pending
Am Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:33:32PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: libatomic-queue
> Version: 0.0+git20201108.d9d66b6-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
This is solved in Git. However, when I try to build the status in Git I
get:
E:
On 21/12/2021 21:12, Steven Robbins wrote:
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 10:22:49 A.M. CST Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 12/21/21 9:00 PM, Pierre Gruet wrote:
On 21/12/2021 14:33, Lance Lin wrote:
Debian Medical Team,
I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of
packages.
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 10:22:49 A.M. CST Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 12/21/21 9:00 PM, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > On 21/12/2021 14:33, Lance Lin wrote:
> >> Debian Medical Team,
> >>
> >> I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of
> >> packages. Two of the packages
On 21/12/2021 13:33, Lance Lin wrote:
Debian Medical Team,
I have started looking at adding autopkgtest suites for a variety of packages.
Two of the packages (hinge, pique) require very large data sets to run their
included examples. The sizes are several GB. It also looks like they may be
Hi all,
Would someone have more hints on the problem?
>Hi Tony, Thanks for replying.
>On 12/20/21 12:59 AM, tony mancill wrote: >>notice that libedlib0 [1]
>exported the >>edlibAlign symbol, but not libedlib1, which >>is what is pulled
>in by libedlib-dev. Could >>that be the source of the
Hi Aaron,
Am Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 09:10:24PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
> Yes, it looks like the build system is set up to produce "thin" archives
> that can't stand on their own; please try patching the Makefile to drop
> the T flag from LINK.A (line 72).
As always thanks for your prompt help
The actual bug was easy to fix but I also needed the help of Aaron
to finally get the package build and uploaded.
--
http://fam-tille.de
17 matches
Mail list logo
