On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
anybody who disagrees here?
I'd say: once it lands in testing. Which stalls because of
insighttoolkit ATM.
I intended to delay the generation of debian-med metapackages until
ginkgocadx has hit testing - so this condition
Hello everybody,
I just realised that in a package that I maintain, emboss, the file
‘test/data/uniprotft.sw’ has a non-free license:
Copyrighted by the UniProt Consortium, see http://www.uniprot.org/terms
Distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License
However, the page
eh, I feel your pain... e.g. now I was thinking to re-upload
pystatsmodels which was already once rejected due to my omission of
mentioning copyright with restrictive license on some quite factual
DB.
unfortunately IMHO we (Debian) are not in position to provide such legal
service to the
3 matches
Mail list logo