Re: Replace aeskulap by ginkocadx in med-practice

2011-07-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: anybody who disagrees here? I'd say: once it lands in testing. Which stalls because of insighttoolkit ATM. I intended to delay the generation of debian-med metapackages until ginkgocadx has hit testing - so this condition

Are ‘UniProt’ records complying with the DFSG ?

2011-07-19 Thread Charles Plessy
Hello everybody, I just realised that in a package that I maintain, emboss, the file ‘test/data/uniprotft.sw’ has a non-free license: Copyrighted by the UniProt Consortium, see http://www.uniprot.org/terms Distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License However, the page

Re: Are ‘UniProt’ records complying with the DFSG ?

2011-07-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
eh, I feel your pain... e.g. now I was thinking to re-upload pystatsmodels which was already once rejected due to my omission of mentioning copyright with restrictive license on some quite factual DB. unfortunately IMHO we (Debian) are not in position to provide such legal service to the