On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:39:07AM +0800, Richard Holland wrote:
libwww-perl-5.808 is a really nasty hack (it breaks an awful lot of other
stuff if it is installed) and in an ideal world we wanted to avoid having to
install it at all. To be honest I'm not sure how we got it to work in the
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:39:13 +0100
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
I checked out clinica from scratch using debcheckout but this did not
changed anything. I guess the original upstream source remained the
same (featuring the waf problem ftpmaster was concerned about)
I've tried fixing
I'm writing to you on behalf of Debian Med, an internal team of the
Debian GNU/Linux distribution which tries to make Debian prepared
best for use in medicine and biology. We created a Debian package [0]
of cufflinks but realized that we can not put it to the official repository
because of
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:39:13PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
I checked out clinica from scratch using debcheckout but this did not
changed anything. I guess the original upstream source remained the
same (featuring the waf problem ftpmaster was concerned about).
Hi Andreas and
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:08:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
indeed, the problem is rather that the files that are checked in the
repository, and the files that are in the upstream archive downloaded by
uscan,
do not match. Probably the archive that was checked in the repository was
Hello Charles,
Can you be more specific? There was no intentional loss of dynamic
linking, and we still build our system dynamically.
Waiting for your response,
SRA Toolkit Team.
At 1:33 AM -0500 1/9/12, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear SRA Toolkit team,
I am attempting to upgrade our Debian
Le Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:49:09AM -0500, SRA Toolkit Development Group a écrit
:
Can you be more specific? There was no intentional loss of dynamic
linking, and we still build our system dynamically.
The following commands give me different results on 2.1.2 and 2.1.3.
make dynamic
Le Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:21:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
it was repackages as required by ftpmaster. Even if it might be
fine now because git-buildpackage works and is able to create the
pristine tarball it is not the very best idea to have a different
tarball without having a
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:32:59PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I would also suggest to change its version number, for instance by adding
‘~dfsg’.
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices#repackagedorigtargz
Sounds reasonable.
git-buildpackage
Le Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:51:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
git-buildpackage --debsign-k Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
It is even simpler:
git-buildpackage -k Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Dear Cole ,
I tried to contact both Catherine Loader and Jiayang Sun .
Catherine seems to be not reachable and Jiayang couldn't help me with
license questions .
Thank you for the cooperation,
Alex
On 01/09/2012 02:42 PM, Cole Trapnell wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the update. Thanks for
We did make a change of default target from
release to pubtools, where the latter is
forcefully static.
If you have already performed a build, you may
want to make clean before anything else.
The steps to put things back to normal would be:
$ make release dynamic
and then things should be
Hi Mark,
It is great to see Fiji approaching
On 01/07/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Longair wrote:
I was very happy about your proposal to start a rearrangement of
Fiji that is DFSG compliant. In parallel to that, I would like to discuss
the possibility to upload more or less what you have with
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
I finally came to the
conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation
package if it is not maintained at all.
I guess the contentes should better go to some kind of Wiki.
So up, up and away
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:51:17PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
I finally came to the
conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation
package if it is not maintained at all.
I guess
15 matches
Mail list logo
