On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:17:00PM -0500, Scott Christley wrote:
> pfft, well that's annoying that the debian-med list didn't bounce back the
> message,
It does bounce back - at least for me (and that's the default behaviour
for all lists @lists.d.o).
> why can't debian-med mailing list have rep
pfft, well that's annoying that the debian-med list didn't bounce back the
message, with the flood of email I get in my box, I rely upon the email threads
to know what to pay attention too! ;-) And while I'm whining, why can't
debian-med mailing list have reply-to for its messages back to the l
Hi Scott,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:37:34PM -0500, Scott Christley wrote:
> Not sure ITP made it to list...
You can always check the mailing list archive in case you are unsure and
you would have found it here[1].
Just let us know how you are advancing and make sure to commit your
state of pack
Andreas Tille writes:
> Aaron, could you provide some bibliographic information for those
> ncbi-tools which are not specifically describing blast? This would be a
> critical point to find a sane decision.
I haven't come across any, but could try to dig some up. Regardless,
please note that th
Not sure ITP made it to list...
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: Scott Christley
> From: Scott Christley
> Date: March 29, 2012 3:47:18 PM CDT
> Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Resent-Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org, w...@debian.org
> Subject:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Ivo Maintz wrote:
>
> better: it's solved now by inserting a line into debian/rules:
> "strip --remove-section=.comment
> debian/libsbml5-octave/$(OCTAVE_PATH)/*.mex"
> ...
> I inserted some other code into debian/rules to find out, where the
> octave stuf
Hi Thorsten,
[...]
> >> I: libsbml5-octave: binary-has-unneeded-section
> >> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/octave/site/oct/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/TranslateSBML.mex
> >> .comment
> >
> > I have no idea, how to fix this. But it's not critical, right?
>
> it is not critical, but somebody had so much concern
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:54:07PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the update you saw are the ones I pushed before attempting to mass-refresh.
> Then I worked on sanitizing the binary/source conversion, and then it was
> time to go to work...
>
> I do my best to document extensively the system. Th
Le Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:19:33AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Charles,
> It is correct that g/gwyddion.copyright was updated (I changed it
> yesterday) but I also added g/gwyddion.upstream which is missing.
> The same is true for libsbml and seq-gen.
> No problem if you are busy. Perha
Le 3/30/12 8:09 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I hope you noticed
>
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2012/03/msg00231.html
I just did :-)
>
> I just have got an anser and included a full quote into my reply.
>
> The f2c author thinks rewriting the critical part should be s
Hi Charles,
thanks for your data update.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:25:58PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Would it somehow be feasible to trigger a "complete reimport of
> > debian-med repository" because I did several changes to make the move
> > to the information in the upstream files as sm
11 matches
Mail list logo
