Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:33:19PM -0500, Laurent Parenteau wrote:
I had the time to install and quickly play with the installed GT.M, and it
worked fine. I've not done deep testing, but I'd say more of a smoke
test. If I hit any issue down the road, I'll let the list know.
Hi,
I'd like to keep you informed on my progress on ugene.
I made several modification to add hardening to ugene, but unfortunatly
this creates issues in compilation. I can sometimes workaround this but
I still get some warning on no-fortify (though it is setup in rules and
my patches).
I still
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 04:54:06PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
in case an ftp trainee has checked the -1 version and now sees a new
one, he would not be delighted by this, as his previous work would
be just a waste of time.
is that from personal experience?
I guess anything but
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:20:57AM +0100, olivier.sallou wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to keep you informed on my progress on ugene.
I made several modification to add hardening to ugene, but unfortunatly
this creates issues in compilation. I can sometimes workaround this but
I still get
Hi all,
My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece of
software written by the Pathogen Informatics team at the Sanger Institute.
I am using pduilber to automate as much as possible the package creation.
I have what I assume to be a source debian package with me:
Hi Jorge,
2013/11/29 Jorge Sebastião Soares j.s.soa...@gmail.com
Hi all,
My name is Jorge Soares and I have taken on the task to package a piece
of software written by the Pathogen Informatics team at the Sanger
Institute.
I am using pduilber to automate as much as possible the package
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
in case an ftp trainee has checked the -1 version and now sees a new
one, he would not be delighted by this, as his previous work would
be just a waste of time.
is that from personal experience?
I just wanted to mention an argument from a
debdiff between the two would quickly show what was changed/fixed thus
possibly addressing already enlisted concerns which trainee would need
to deal upon resubmission anyways, thus imho the situation would
be a win-win
Did you have a look at dak[1]? From my point of view debdiff is not
Le Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 08:03:34PM +, nore...@alioth.debian.org a écrit :
Daniel Barker (dbarker-guest) a demandé à rejoindre votre projet. Vous pouvez
approuver sa demande ici:
https://alioth.debian.org/project/admin/users.php?group_id=30063
Commentaires de l'utilisateur :
It would
Hello everybody,
I have brushed up our Group policy. I think that all my changes are
consensual. If not, please let me know and I will promptly correct.
Here are the notable changes.
- Recommend the 3.0 (quilt) format.
- dh is recommended over CDBS unless CDBS has a specific advantage.
-
10 matches
Mail list logo