Re: Please check new version of tophat

2014-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dominique, On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:12:13PM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: Le Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Dominique Belhachemi a écrit : Based on the changelog I would say that you can skip the

Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000

2014-10-06 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Bhaskar, On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB] Those *openssl* files are versions of the reference implementation of the plugin compiled with #include, #if, etc. configured to call call OpenSSL.  They are not actually linked to OpenSSL or other libraries - linking happens

Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000

2014-10-06 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
Thorsten -- I'll digest your comments in detail once I get out of conference calls and meetings, but the short answer to changing the license is that running anything through Legal will take more time than we have available. Regards -- Bhaskar On 10/06/2014 07:55 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:

Re: Error while loading shared libraries

2014-10-06 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Hi Andreas it might be sensible if you commit your work to a repository to let others have a look. Otherwise its hard to do some speculation. You're right. I didn't committed my work before because the Git repository of fw4spl wasn't ready. But now it is, and I've just pushed my package on

Re: Updating the fis-gtm package to V6.2-000

2014-10-06 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 10/06/2014 07:55 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi Bhaskar, On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB] Those *openssl* files are versions of the reference implementation of the plugin compiled with #include, #if, etc. configured to call call OpenSSL. They are not actually linked to

Question about packaging a nonfree package ( no ITP yet )

2014-10-06 Thread Jorge Sebastião Soares
Hi all, I have just created an ITP for a software package called gubbins (ITP: 764232). I am in direct contact with the upstream author of gubbins (sit next to him really). Gubbins has a dependency on a piece of software called Fastml. Fastml is not free. Actually is published under no license.

Re: Question about packaging a nonfree package ( no ITP yet )

2014-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jorge, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:48:28PM +0100, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote: I am in direct contact with the upstream author of gubbins (sit next to him really). Gubbins has a dependency on a piece of software called Fastml. Fastml is not free. Actually is published under no license.

Re: Question about packaging a nonfree package ( no ITP yet )

2014-10-06 Thread Jorge Sebastião Soares
Hi Andreas, Good hearing from you. On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi Jorge, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:48:28PM +0100, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote: I am in direct contact with the upstream author of gubbins (sit next to him really). Gubbins has a

Re: Question about packaging a nonfree package ( no ITP yet )

2014-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Jorge Sebastião Soares wrote: Good hearing from you. :-) ditto As far as I know a package with no license at all is simply not redistributable ... since it is lacking the permission to be distributed (even in non-free). I now see how