Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

Hi Afif, first of all thanks for looking at Circlator, which was on my list as well :) >> I'm looking into packaging Circlator, which depends on the Sanger >> program bio_assembly_refinement. Looking into it, I'm wondering whether >> this is a tool that will just get folded into circlator

Re: RFS: python-typing

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:33:24PM +0100, Michael Crusoe wrote: > Thanks! > > git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/python-typing.git As you wrote in the ITP, are you still interested in this? FYI, I'm a supporter of starting dropping python2 bits when possible; removing py2 will be painful

Bug#817056: ITP: python-typing -- Type Hints for Python

See https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#suggested-syntax-for-python-2-7-and-straddling-code Pe 8 mar. 2016 06:24, "Brian May" a scris: > "Michael R. Crusoe" writes: > > > This is a backport of the standard library typing module to Python > > versions

Re: Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

On الإثنين 7 آذار 2016 21:48, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > Hi, Sascha, > I'm looking into packaging Circlator, which depends on the Sanger > program bio_assembly_refinement. Looking into it, I'm wondering whether > this is a tool that will just get folded into circlator eventually. Do > you think

Worth packaging bio_assembly_refinement?

Hi, Sascha, I'm looking into packaging Circlator, which depends on the Sanger program bio_assembly_refinement. Looking into it, I'm wondering whether this is a tool that will just get folded into circlator eventually. Do you think it's worth packaging it separately? Thanks and regards Afif --

Bug#817056: ITP: python-typing -- Type Hints for Python

"Michael R. Crusoe" writes: > This is a backport of the standard library typing module to Python > versions older than 3.5. Not sure what the point of this is; doesn't typing hinting require PEP 3107, which isn't in Python 2.x? -- Brian May

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:38:55PM -0600, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, Peter Rice wrote: > > The conclusion was that scientific data (SwissProt, PDB, etc.) are > > scientific facts and it is not reasonable to require permission to > >

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, Peter Rice wrote: > We had this discussion some years back about SwissProt protein > sequence entries included as test data in EMBOSS. We also have PDB > files in the EMBOSS test data. > > The conclusion was that scientific data (SwissProt, PDB, etc.) are > scientific facts

Bug#817056: ITP: python-typing -- Type Hints for Python

That was my plan. Though I just realized that I don't need this if I switch to building only the Python 3 version of schema-salad-tool so I am likely to close this ITP. The package is at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/python-typing.git if anyone is interested. On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

Hi,  > * The user assumes all responsibility for insuring that intellectual > property claims associated with any data set deposited in the PDB > archive are honored.  It should be understood that the PDB data files > do not contain any information  on intellectual property claims with > the

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

Hi Riley, On 07/03/2016 19:20, Riley Baird wrote: The distribution of modified PDB data including the records HEADER, CAVEAT, REVDAT, SPRSDE, DBREF, SEQADV, and MODRES in PDB format and their mmCIF and XML equivalents is not allowed. I'm not sure what the PDB format is, so I might be wrong,

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

> The distribution of modified PDB data including the records HEADER, CAVEAT, > REVDAT, SPRSDE, DBREF, SEQADV, and MODRES in PDB format and their mmCIF and > XML equivalents is not allowed. I'm not sure what the PDB format is, so I might be wrong, but my intuition is that trying to stop people

Bug#817056: ITP: python-typing -- Type Hints for Python

On Monday, March 07, 2016 09:01:30 AM Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Debian Med team > > * Package name: python-typing > Version : 3.5.0.1 > Upstream Author : Guido van Rossum, Jukka Lehtosalo, Łukasz Langa >

Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

Alex Mestiashvili writes: > I am going to package a software with pdb files in the test suite and > I wonder if the license below can be considered free. For reference in the discussion and for later reference, it helps to have the license text directly in a message. >

Can "PDB" license be considered free ?

Hi All, I am going to package a software with pdb files in the test suite and I wonder if the license below can be considered free. ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org/pub/pdb/advisory.txt http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/static.do?p=general_information/about_pdb/policies_references.html Thank you, Alex

RFS: python-typing

Thanks! git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/python-typing.git -- Michael R. Crusoe

Bug#817056: ITP: python-typing -- Type Hints for Python

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Med team * Package name: python-typing Version : 3.5.0.1 Upstream Author : Guido van Rossum, Jukka Lehtosalo, Łukasz Langa * URL :

Re: bamtools_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Thanks! On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:26 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > uploaded. > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM Michael Crusoe > wrote: > >> My apologies; I've updated Git >> >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Afif Elghraoui >>