On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:56:03PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Both libblas-dev and libblas-dev | libblas.so would lead to successful
> > > builds on autobuilders. The latter always pick libblas-dev in case an
> > > alternative implementation is not already installed.
> >
> > OK, so
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 14:38 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Hmmm, this message droped in my inbox after uploading. I'm not sure how
> > > important this might be - in any case the package has built nicely.
> >
Hi again,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > Hmmm, this message droped in my inbox after uploading. I'm not sure how
> > important this might be - in any case the package has built nicely.
>
> Both libblas-dev and libblas-dev | libblas.so would lead to
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 11:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ghislain,
> > Other comments:
> >
> > - "Add libblas-dev dependency (sub-dependency of libdlib-dev) to
> > plastimatch"
> >
> > If libdlib-dev is missing a dependency (BLAS), it should be fixed
> > there. Transitive dependencies should
Hi Ghislain,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:00:50AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >
> > The more elegant way is to simply specify "any". Autobuilders will
> > notice themselves whether a Build-Dependency exists or not and simply do
> > nothing if a Build-Dependency is missing.
>
> I second
5 matches
Mail list logo
