Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 01/22/2012 05:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I had another look into fis-gtm-initial package and noticed that it creates a deb package containing two (=both available) binary tarballs contained in the source ball. IMHO that's pretty useless and thus I changed debian/rules to only install

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:46:05AM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: ## rmdir: failed to remove `TMPPOSTINST': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing fis-gtm-initial (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 01/23/2012 11:20 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:46:05AM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: ## rmdir: failed to remove `TMPPOSTINST': Directory not empty dpkg: error processing fis-gtm-initial (--configure): subprocess installed

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: IMHO that's pretty useless and thus I changed debian/rules to only install the tar which matches the architecture that matches the build system. There has been a discussion about this some time ago ... (in my case

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 01/23/2012 02:01 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: IMHO that's pretty useless and thus I changed debian/rules to only install the tar which matches the architecture that matches the build system. There has been a

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:31:26PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB] There are several MUMPS compilers, both free / open source and otherwise, but in terms of supporting a full MUMPS, there are only two, of which GT.M is the only one that is Free. Are any of them a) written in C ? (or,

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:36:52AM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB2] Yes, under /usr/lib/fis-gtm is a terrible place for temporary files! As the files in the GT.M binary tarball can all be deleted post installation, the installation script can use mktemp -d to create a temporary directory.

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 01/23/2012 03:45 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:31:26PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB] There are several MUMPS compilers, both free / open source and otherwise, but in terms of supporting a full MUMPS, there are only two, of which GT.M is the only one that is

Re: [MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-23 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:13:26PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: On 01/23/2012 03:45 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 02:31:26PM -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: [KSB] There are several MUMPS compilers, both free / open source and otherwise, but in terms of supporting a full MUMPS,

[MoM] Regarding status of fis-gtm-initial package

2012-01-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I had another look into fis-gtm-initial package and noticed that it creates a deb package containing two (=both available) binary tarballs contained in the source ball. IMHO that's pretty useless and thus I changed debian/rules to only install the tar which matches the architecture that