Re: Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-02-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 07:35:12PM +0100, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > > Excellent! I think we need some goblet for the most active Outreachy / > > GSoC remainer (=beeing most active after the internship endet) and you > > are my favourite candidate for this praise! ;-) > > Ahah, thank you,

Re: Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-02-04 Thread Liubov Chuprikova
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 11:32, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > > > I have just pushed a fix of this! The problem was with two processes > > competing for the same temporary file, as the tempfile names were defined > > static. > >

Re: Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-02-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > I have just pushed a fix of this! The problem was with two processes > competing for the same temporary file, as the tempfile names were defined > static. Excellent! I think we need some goblet for the most active Outreachy

Re: Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-02-04 Thread Liubov Chuprikova
Hi Andreas, On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 16:23, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help upstream > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cbcrg/tcoffee/issues/13 > > Hi Liubov, > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 04:06:51PM +0100, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > > I was trying to figure out the reason for

Re: Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-01-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/cbcrg/tcoffee/issues/13 Hi Liubov, On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 04:06:51PM +0100, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > I was trying to figure out the reason for the failure but without any > success. It appeared that the error is

Bug#917143: t-coffee autopkgtest regression

2019-01-27 Thread Liubov Chuprikova
Hi, I was trying to figure out the reason for the failure but without any success. It appeared that the error is reproducible with the upstream's source version, so I have just opened an issue [1] to inform the upstream about this bug. [1] https://github.com/cbcrg/tcoffee/issues/13 With