On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have no special interest in the "obscure library" I volunteer to
> maintain it in Debian. I would also make sure it gets sponsored. I have a
> special interest in the cbf library (CIF binary format, esssentially
A new version of rasmol (2.7.4) is going to be released soon.
Upstream
has added a dependency to a rather obscure library, which the build
system actually tries to download during build. This is of course not
how it should be done in Debian. I've packaged the library in
question, CBFlib (see ITP
Hi,
FWIW, I have cbflib package already in my PPA:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10330505/cbflib_0.7.8-0ubuntu1~ppa1.dsc
Cheers,
Morten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Teemu Ikonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two-way syncing between SVN and most other distributed VCS is possible
> (I've tried it with bzr and git). The problem here is not really
> subversion, but svn-buildpackage, which encourages storing only the
> debian dir. I suppose it would be theoretic
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:01:10PM +0100, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> [...] The problem here is not really
> subversion, but svn-buildpackage, which encourages storing only the
> debian dir.
That's not something you can pin directly on svn-buildpackage. In
principle, there's nothing stopping one from
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:01:10PM +0100, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> > > Team maintenance for these packages is ok, if the team in question
> > > wants to work with git.
> > For the package in question the DebiChem team (in CC) comes into
> > mind as well. Moreover team maintenance does not ne
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> If you maintain your packages in a VCS please add propper tags to
> the control file. My wild guess is, that they should look like
>
>Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/git/
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Rasmol upstream has now released version 2.7.4.2, which also contains
my GTK patches. I've made new packages of rasmol and the new
build-dependency cbflib. The source packages are at
http://esko.osmas.info/~tmx/cbflib/ and
http://esko.osmas.info/~tmx/rasm
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
Group maintenance would be ok, but as mentioned in the ITP (#467655),
I'm not a big fan of maintaining patch stacks under debian/.
Well the URL you quotet there[1] inspired myself to start a discussion
at debian-devel[2]. This initial mail leaded to a l
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I take the freedom to quote your private mail to Debian-Med list and
> hope you don't mind about ignorance of the netiquette in this special
> case.]
No problem, and sorry for not following up sooner.
>0. Think a
[I take the freedom to quote your private mail to Debian-Med list and
hope you don't mind about ignorance of the netiquette in this special
case.]
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
A new version of rasmol (2.7.4) is going to be released soon. Upstream
has added a dependency to a rather
11 matches
Mail list logo
