Re: Droping med-doc?

2012-01-09 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: I finally came to the conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation package if it is not maintained at all. I guess the contentes should better go to some kind of Wiki. So up, up and away

Re: Droping med-doc?

2012-01-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:51:17PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: I finally came to the conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation package if it is not maintained at all. I guess

Droping med-doc?

2012-01-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, since several years I plan to work on the med-doc package and always lower this task in the list of priorities. I finally came to the conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation package if it is not maintained at all. Popcon shows no numbers which might make me

Re: Droping med-doc?

2012-01-08 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 08:50:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: since several years I plan to work on the med-doc package and always lower this task in the list of priorities. I finally came to the conclusion that it makes no sense to pretend having a documentation package if it is not

Re: Droping med-doc?

2012-01-08 Thread Eric MAEKER
Le 8 janv. 2012 à 20:56, Karsten Hilbert a écrit : On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 08:50:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: since several years I plan to work on the med-doc package and always lower this task in the list of priorities. I finally came to the conclusion that it makes no sense to