On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:11:55PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Corrected, tested, and uploaded.
Cool. I owe you a $drink! (at DebConf 17?)
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Corrected, tested, and uploaded.
Best,
Gert
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Gert Wollny:
> Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:10 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> >
> > Hi Gert,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It would be *really* cool if somebody
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:10 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Gert,
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly
> > > ignore
> > > the test failure by adding
> > >
> > >
Hi Gert,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore
> > the test failure by adding
> >
> > override_dh_auto_test:
> > dh_auto_test || true
> >
> > and upload the package after testing that the
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>
> It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore
> the test failure by adding
>
> override_dh_auto_test:
> dh_auto_test || true
>
> and upload the package after testing that the binary will start.
I
Hi,
I have a *really* strange problem building openmolar which I described
on Debian Python list[1]. Since nobody else can reproduce it chances
are good that you can build the current status of packaging[2].
It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore
the test failure
7 matches
Mail list logo
