Hello Mattia,
> Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag
> > now, forgot to do it before.
> uploaded, enjoy! :)
> I just did a couple of tiny (hopefully uncontroversial) changes
> before
> it. I hope that's fine.
Thanks for the cleanup,
With the URL's I saw the
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 07:46:00PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 17:36 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> >
> > >
> > > I'll ping you on the list when this is done.
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag
> now, forgot to
Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 17:36 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
>
> >
> > I'll ping you on the list when this is done.
> Thanks.
>
Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag
now, forgot to do it before.
many thanks,
Gert
Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 16:42 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> >
> > - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the
> > library
> > package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6).
> > - d/copyright overhaul
> What
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the library
> package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6).
> - d/copyright overhaul
What about dropping the manual -dbg in favour of the automatic ones?
--
regards,
I'll do it, hopefully in a bunch of hours.
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> I've prepared the latest version of dcmtk in the packaging git for
> uploading. The version changes the SO-Name of the library, hence I'd
> suggest to upload first to experimental so I can
Dear all,
I've prepared the latest version of dcmtk in the packaging git for
uploading. The version changes the SO-Name of the library, hence I'd
suggest to upload first to experimental so I can later check whether
all reveres dependencies build properly.
Major changes:
- Because upstream
7 matches
Mail list logo
