Hi Steffen,
Steffen Möller, on 2020-12-01 19:42:23 +0100:
> Does this mean that the many q2-xyz packages we can now also think about
> updating?
Sounds like it! :)
Cheers,
--
Étienne Mollier
Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse
Well done, Étienne!
Does this mean that the many q2-xyz packages we can now also think about
updating?
Best,
Steffen
On 01.12.20 19:14, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Tille, on 2020-12-01 09:46:28 +0100:
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>>>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2020-12-01 09:46:28 +0100:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > Changes are not marked ready for
> > upload yet, as there might still be some blocking points
> > reported by the package tracker[1], notably 32-bits support.
>
> I'd
Hi Étienne,
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Sorry it took quite a long time, I kind of struggled a bit with
> the test suite of qiime. In the end I had to disable the build
> time test, since apparently, pkg_resources is rather picky about
> the
Hi there,
Sorry it took quite a long time, I kind of struggled a bit with
the test suite of qiime. In the end I had to disable the build
time test, since apparently, pkg_resources is rather picky about
the location of its modules, and the hack in place was not
working with python 3.8 and 3.9.
Hi Aaron,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:48:44 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> I have an upload mostly ready, but still have a few HTTPS-related fixes
> to take care of. I just haven't pushed anything yet in case I need to
> rework any changes first.
I just noticed that the upload would also fix
Andreas Tille writes:
> Any help is really appreciated - even urgently appreciated since one of
> our users intends to use prokka which just says:
I have an upload mostly ready, but still have a few HTTPS-related fixes
to take care of. I just haven't pushed anything yet in
Hi Aaron,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:54:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes - but at least we do now have a working watch file that enabled me
> downloading the new upstream source. As I wrote in another mail[1] I
> failed injecting it into the packaging Git.
I was able to solve this - new
Hi Afif,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:58:58AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
so we do have counter examples to this (surely not build with d-shlibs)
and so it might be possibly to forget d-shlibs and move around the files
via usual dh_install but I think we should draw a cutting line here. I'd
Hi Afif,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:24:58PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
It might be helpful to add that command in the managing patches section on
the Debian Med policy. I was always following the steps there when doing my
patching. I know the New Maintainer's Guide has it, but it's not easy
Hi, Andreas,
On الثلاثاء 26 أيار 2015 04:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Afif,
No need to sorry about this. There are long standing developers who not
provide DEP3 headers. :-)
It might be helpful to add that command in the managing patches section on
the Debian Med policy. I was always
Hi, Andreas,
On الإثنين 25 أيار 2015 00:13, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Afif,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:12:00PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
I tried to go ahead with packaging shared libraries, but it looks like I
have to read three to five more manuals before I can proceed and know
Hi Afif,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:20:19AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
Hmmm, I can not parse this as a specific question to me - just ask if I
can help somehow. Regarding packaging shared libraries I personally
recommend using d-shlibs. There are some examples in our repositories
for
Hi, Andreas,
On الثلاثاء 26 أيار 2015 02:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
Thanks. These are good enough pointers for me to start trying something. I
was mostly confused by having to mind the symbols and sonames. It looks like
I should just build the .so files and take care of their placement in
Hi Afif,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:06:01AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
Yes. I like the fact that d-shlibmove makes it easy by simply
specifying --multiarch and that you do not neet to care whether
sonames are correct or not since d-shlibmove checks it for you.
Things basically turn out to
Hi, Andreas,
I tried to go ahead with packaging shared libraries, but it looks like I
have to read three to five more manuals before I can proceed and know
what I'm doing.
The package is otherwise ready to go. I have man pages for all the
executables and I believe everything is in order. My
Hi Afif,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:12:00PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
I tried to go ahead with packaging shared libraries, but it looks like I
have to read three to five more manuals before I can proceed and know what
I'm doing.
Hmmm, I can not parse this as a specific
I'm writing this mail so that interested parties know where this work stands.
I had a call today (2013/01/25) with Luis Ibanez and Brad King from Kitware to
get up to speed on the packaging for GT.M (thanks!).
* I have an account and uploaded an SSH-key so that I can checkout and commit
Hi Amul,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:45:11PM -0500, Amul Shah wrote:
I'm writing this mail so that interested parties know where this work stands.
I had a call today (2013/01/25) with Luis Ibanez and Brad King from Kitware
to get up to speed on the packaging for GT.M (thanks!).
* I have
19 matches
Mail list logo