Re: Wham aligner package name - just wham? wham-align?

Hi Afif, On 30.05.19 17:57, Afif Elghraoui wrote: Hello, On May 30, 2019 5:51:05 AM EDT, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: Hi Steffen, I have no exact idea why alignment tools are all given such short names. We have http://last.cbrc.jp/ as last-align with is. Should I do the same for wham and

Re: Wham aligner package name - just wham? wham-align?

Hello, On May 30, 2019 5:51:05 AM EDT, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > >Hi Steffen, > >> I have no exact idea why alignment tools are all given such short >names. >> We have http://last.cbrc.jp/ as last-align with is. Should I do the >same >> for wham and name the package wham-align? > >That's what I

Re: Wham aligner package name - just wham? wham-align?

Hi Steffen, > I have no exact idea why alignment tools are all given such short names. > We have http://last.cbrc.jp/ as last-align with is. Should I do the same > for wham and name the package wham-align? That's what I did for lambda [1] and lambda2 [2] as well. Keeps the namespace clean and

Wham aligner package name - just wham? wham-align?

http://research.cs.wisc.edu/wham/ Hello, This is yet another runtime dependency of bcbio. I have no exact idea why alignment tools are all given such short names. We have http://last.cbrc.jp/ as last-align with is. Should I do the same for wham and name the package wham-align? I am not aware