On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 14:38 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Hmmm, this message droped in my inbox after uploading. I'm not sure how
> > > important this might be - in any case the package has built nicely.
> >
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:56:03PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > Both libblas-dev and libblas-dev | libblas.so would lead to successful
> > > builds on autobuilders. The latter always pick libblas-dev in case an
> > > alternative implementation is not already installed.
> >
> > OK, so
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:23:36AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >
> > I should have posted an update. Upstream has moved consensuscore2 into a
> > new source package, unanimity [1]. The packaging issues I was having are
> > due to building the mixed-language code base. I have not found
Whoa, wait a minute. Consensuscore2 hasn't been deprecated yet--it's just been
bundled with other things in the unanimity suite.
The reason I don't support removal of this source package is that we might find
the best solution to be extracting consensuscore2 from unanimity and using that
for
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 08:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:52:07PM -0500, Gregory Sharp wrote:
> >
> > > I admit if there was an explicit reason I simply forgot it (but its also
> > > for amd64, right).
> >
> > The architectures are amd64 and i386
Hi,
I've looked into hilive and made the package build properly:
- the new upstream version closes #833392 (checked on i386)
- it builds only with seqan2 (so this question is resolved)
- I've also added a patch to remove some forced CXX flags
Since my DD status is still pending (but AM
Done - thanks a lot for your contribution (fingers crossed for your
DD status before Christmas ;-))
Andreas.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've looked into hilive and made the package build properly:
>
> - the new upstream version closes #833392
Thank you all for your responses to the many polls, and for your patience.
I will start collecting quotes from hotels and meetings spaces. Feel free
to book transportation now.
Hi Ghislain,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:00:50AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> >
> > The more elegant way is to simply specify "any". Autobuilders will
> > notice themselves whether a Build-Dependency exists or not and simply do
> > nothing if a Build-Dependency is missing.
>
> I second
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 11:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ghislain,
> > Other comments:
> >
> > - "Add libblas-dev dependency (sub-dependency of libdlib-dev) to
> > plastimatch"
> >
> > If libdlib-dev is missing a dependency (BLAS), it should be fixed
> > there. Transitive dependencies should
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:17:13 -0800 Afif Elghraoui wrote:
> Hi, Andreas,
>
> على الأربعاء 9 تشرين الثاني 2016 ‫03:11، كتب
> Andreas Tille:
> >
> > do you have any news with this issue?
> >
>
> I should have posted an update. Upstream has moved
Hi again,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:05:02AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > Hmmm, this message droped in my inbox after uploading. I'm not sure how
> > important this might be - in any case the package has built nicely.
>
> Both libblas-dev and libblas-dev | libblas.so would lead to
12 matches
Mail list logo