Re: Packaging of MafFilter

2016-04-06 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, Many thanks for your email. Indeed, the debian package should not be in the distributed tar.gz, I will fix that. One important thing: MafFilter depends on the Bio++ libraries, which are packaged for debian, but not up to date. The packager was Loic Dachary, but he admitted having no

Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

2016-04-07 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Julien, > > > > > but I understand that you do that from the debian git > > repositories, right? So if I push a commit tagged 2.3.0 to > git.debian.org, > > then you will automatically create a new version of the package, is

Re: Lets maintain libbpp-phyl-omics in Debian Med team

2016-04-11 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Julien, > > > > Just a pragmatic question: If I would like to include these in the 2.2.0 > > version, how can I do that with tags? I mean, we created a dedicated > branch > > for each stable version so that it's easy to in

Re: Open issue with libbpp-core

2017-05-27 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
'd ask > > > hit to clarify this. > > H, I was actually not starting this but I took over an unmaintained > package which was once created by Julien Yann Dutheil (in CC) who is > also upstream. I tried to make some sense out of the packaging and > moved it into team ma

Re: Open issue with libbpp-core

2017-06-10 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
ojet Grasp, Labex Ecofect > Bureau 116, Bâtiment Mendel 1er étage, UCBL > > > De : Andreas Tille > Envoyé : mardi 6 juin 2017 11:23 > À : GINDRAUD FRANCOIS > Cc : Julien Yann Dutheil; Debian Med Project List > Objet : Re: Open is

Re: Open issue with libbpp-core

2017-06-13 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
ille wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > We have now committed several fixes to the cmake files and increased the > > interface numbers in all libs (excepted the bpp-qt one, which did not > > change since

Re: Open issue with libbpp-core

2017-06-14 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
; packages that are not properly maintained but easily could be so if the > information would be properly propagated. ;-) > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Hi Julien, > > > >

Re: Bug#865552: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-13 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
> for that, but was not successful, and I am a bit unsure about whom to > > > > contact. Do you think we could start this month monitoring thing in > > > > mid-august? I guest that would be the most efficient way so that I > stop > > > > bothering you f

Re: Bug#865552: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-13 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Julien, > > > > > Also I am not sure what you intend by "explicit notification"... not > > > > sending an email to the full list, right? > > > > > > Well, your changes made it to the commit mailing list[1] and I would > >

Re: Bug#865552: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-14 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Debian Med folks, I have added some patches on the libppp-phyl package which remove some "deprecation" warnings. Such warnings were generated in loops during unit tests and might explain why some of them were reaching the timeout limit. Let's see if that improves things... Best, Julien. On

Re: Bug#865552: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-15 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
017 at 08:25:17AM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > Yes, indeed. The other test that somehow fails was known to us. It is > > actually badly designed because it relies on simulations, and has a 5% > > change or so to fail just by chance. I guess that is time to do sthg > a

Re: Bug#866365: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-17 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Hi Andreas, But now at least these are all timeout issues, all numerical instabilities seem to have now been solved. I have committed a fix that increases again the timeout limit for the slow architectures (now 6s). This SHOULD now work! Best, Julien. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Andrea

Re: Bug#866365: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-18 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, Have now fixed all libs, and removed all postinst scripts that are no longer necessary. Hopefully this should now be all green for the libraries and we should be able to proceed with the programs. Best, Julien. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jul

Re: Bug#866365: libbpp-phyl FTBFS with test failures

2017-07-18 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Dear Andreas, On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > it uses "UNRELEASED" as the "target distribution". Its safer to leave > this instead of setting it to "unstable". It might happen that I (or > some other team member) will not have time to upload quickly and when > reading

Re: Last commit did not help (Was: [libbpp-phyl] branch master updated (85dac66 -> c4bc05c))

2017-08-23 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:50:02AM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > Dear Andreas, > > > > Ok, this is as far as I get and need a bit of help I'm afraid. > > Using pdebuilder shows no issue (apart from a few lintian

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-09 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Hi, For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach the author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try? Julien. On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 8:31 PM Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Crusoe, on 2020-05-09 19:48:06 +0200: > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 2:27 PM Étien

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

2020-05-11 Thread Julien Yann Dutheil
Tille, on 2020-05-10 07:06:09 +0200: > > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 10:32:32PM +0200, Julien Yann Dutheil wrote: > > > For once, maybe I can be of some help there. I shall be able to reach > the > > > author of PAML directly... shall I give it a try? > > > > Yes, plea