Re: Considerations for pird (Was: pirs/2.0.2+dfsg-2 follow-up)

2016-12-01 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:48:15PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > >I admit that loosing performance on amd64 where people will use the > >software in reality is not acceptable just for beeing able to compile it > >on random architecture that are not relevant for practical work. So if > >the

Re: Considerations for pird (Was: pirs/2.0.2+dfsg-2 follow-up)

2016-12-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/12/16 12:33, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Ghislain, thanks for your bug fixes and the tracking whether everything went fine afterwards. On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:31:30AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Looks like there are more non-portable options being used in pirs according to the build