Re: your mail

2016-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Kerim, On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 05:53:44PM +0300, Kerim Ölçer wrote: > Hello Andreas, I looked at Emperors liscences. Some of them use copyright > liscences ( no MIT,GPL etc.). You looked it before is this a problem if it > is what should i do ? Best Regards. I think the first thing to do is me

Re: your mail

2015-07-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear Hervé and Steffen, On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:16:57PM +, Hervé Ménager wrote: > Dear all, > I and Steffen are currently meeting at ISMB2015 to discuss and hack the > description of debian-med packages using EDAM. We will try to come up with > a workable solution. Please get in touch if yo

Re: your mail

2012-07-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31:37AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: > > you are directly addressing Yaroslav and thus I will not actively look > > into this until further notice. However, I would like to do some > > comment: The fields Vcs-Git and Vcs-B

Re: your mail

2012-07-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
1. On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Andreas Tille wrote: > you are directly addressing Yaroslav and thus I will not actively look > into this until further notice. However, I would like to do some > comment: The fields Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser should point to the > repository where the Debian packaging is don

Re: your mail

2012-07-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrei, you are directly addressing Yaroslav and thus I will not actively look into this until further notice. However, I would like to do some comment: The fields Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser should point to the repository where the Debian packaging is done and should be probably on git.debian.or

Re: your mail

2012-01-04 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, Thanks a lot for the sponsorship! What about an i386 package? Shall I build some and post it to where you can fetch it, like we did with amd64.deb? Cheers, Andrei On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:53:04 -0500 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > ok -- please find attached the slightly corrected vers

Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > ok -- please find attached the slightly corrected version -- this should > be sufficient -- reupload and I think we should be ready to go Done, uploaded to the same URL. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
ok -- please find attached the slightly corrected version -- this should be sufficient -- reupload and I think we should be ready to go On Wed, 04 Jan 2012, andrei zavada wrote: > I am uploading the same version 0.4.4-1 again, but with debian/copyright > and changelog amended: > http://johnhommer.

Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
Hi, I am uploading the same version 0.4.4-1 again, but with debian/copyright and changelog amended: http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source/deb/aghermann_0.4.4-1.dsc Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Sorry -- I just can't parse this: -- somewhat really liked wrapping things up: > ---8<--- > Format: > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/Upstream-Name: > AghermannUpstream-Contact: Andrei Zavada Source: > http://johnhommer.com/academic/code/aghermann/source > Files: *

Re: your mail

2012-01-03 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, On 3 January 2012 02:16, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > * Author: Andrei Zavada > * Parts from PhysioToolKit > (http://www.physionet.org/physiotools, > * by George B. Moody (geo...@mit.edu)) After studying debian maintainer's guide, I

Re: your mail

2012-01-02 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
1. heh -- debian/copyright seems still to need some work just ran into * Author: Andrei Zavada * Parts from PhysioToolKit (http://www.physionet.org/physiotools, * by George B. Moody (geo...@mit.edu)) additionally IIRC according to DEP-5 shouldn'

Re: your mail

2012-01-02 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, > I am still to do a quick code-review and testing and then with > those copyright file changes we might be all set to go The rest of the holidays (green tea works!) was actually quite productive, and here's version 0.4.4 for your code-reviewing pleasure. I've even updated copyright y

Re: your mail

2011-12-30 Thread andrei zavada
>  once again -- would be nice if you verify that I can get them:My bad, too > much typos, sorry. Yes, the source tarball should not have "-1" in the file > name; I renamed it at johnhommer.com/... > BTW -- you might like to discover the tool 'dput' so you could just give it a > .changes files a

Re: your mail

2011-12-29 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, andrei zavada wrote: > Indeed, I misunderestimated build-depends, now corrected. Strange > that debuild did not complain about unsatisfied build dependencies, > contrary to what `debuild --help` says ("option -D enabled by > default"). After passing -D explicitly to debuild,

Re: your mail

2011-12-29 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, Indeed, I misunderestimated build-depends, now corrected. Strange that debuild did not complain about unsatisfied build dependencies, contrary to what `debuild --help` says ("option -D enabled by default"). After passing -D explicitly to debuild, I was able to sort this one out. Hu

Re: your mail

2011-12-27 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Andrei, damn holidays keep us away from all the fun!... before reply in full -- regarding build-depends -- did you try/build in a clean environment (e.g. using pbuilder or cowbuilder?) if not -- give it a shout and then adjust build-depends accordingly ;) here is my protocol of 'struggle': ht

Re: your mail

2011-12-25 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, Sorry for taking a week to respond. There was not a single day last week I could have a contiguous space of one hour to address the issues. > there is 1 more crucial step:  projects which are not Debian specific > should not be packaged in "native debian" format, i.e. when you > hav

Re: your mail

2011-12-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Andrei, congrats on becoming friends with lintian ;) 1. there is 1 more crucial step: projects which are not Debian specific should not be packaged in "native debian" format, i.e. when you have only .orig.tar.gz + .dsc -- they should have .diff.gz or .debian.tar.gz ( source format quilt 3.0,

Re: your mail

2011-12-19 Thread andrei zavada
Hi Yaroslav, After learning some Makefile.am-fu, aghermann-0.4.3.2 is now lintian-clean: the single remaining .so file is stowed into /usr/lib/aghermann. Please have a look at sf.net/projects/aghermann or review it online at gihub.com/hmmr/aghermann (there is an -amd64.deb, too). What do I do ne

Re: your mail

2011-12-11 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Andrei, Great -- thanks. Since the library is "internal" ideal resolution imho would be to hide it away under usr/lib/aghermann/ and link all binaries against it (rpath). that should take care about lintian issues ;) On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, andrei zavada wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > I have fixed a