Re: Re: bart: version 0.4.04
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28:44PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional > > > information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. > > > > Then let's keep it like it is and if it works on all architectures > > and no other problems appear in the next week, I would appreciate > > if could then upload to strech-backports. > > OK. Uploading to backports is easy and I can happily do this. > > > I the mean time, I will see how one can request access to systems > > with some of the problematic architectures... > > Should I upload the current state in Git and you watch the architectures > based on the latest changes or do you want me to wait until you have > sorted out those issues? Please upload the current state. (I also added another simple autopkgtest and I would like to confirm that it works. Locally, it does.) Best, Martin
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28:44PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional > > information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. > > Then let's keep it like it is and if it works on all architectures > and no other problems appear in the next week, I would appreciate > if could then upload to strech-backports. OK. Uploading to backports is easy and I can happily do this. > I the mean time, I will see how one can request access to systems > with some of the problematic architectures... Should I upload the current state in Git and you watch the architectures based on the latest changes or do you want me to wait until you have sorted out those issues? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
>On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > > I have another question: Would it be ok to use a dependency > > on debhelper (>=10) instead of (>=11~) ? Then the package > > could be build on stable without changes. > > There is no strict reason to enforce debhelper 11 - I'm just > in favour of using the latest debhelper version if there is no > good reason to pick an older one. > > BTW, I'm *intentionally* using 11~ since the tilde works for Stretch > backports. Debhelper 11 is in stretch backports and if you want to > provide bart also on stable systems I'd recommend to do an official > backport (just ping me if the version you prefer has hit testing and > I'll do an upload to stretch-backports). > > Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional > information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. Then let's keep it like it is and if it works on all architectures and no other problems appear in the next week, I would appreciate if could then upload to strech-backports. I the mean time, I will see how one can request access to systems with some of the problematic architectures... Best, Martin
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > I have another question: Would it be ok to use a dependency > on debhelper (>=10) instead of (>=11~) ? Then the package > could be build on stable without changes. There is no strict reason to enforce debhelper 11 - I'm just in favour of using the latest debhelper version if there is no good reason to pick an older one. BTW, I'm *intentionally* using 11~ since the tilde works for Stretch backports. Debhelper 11 is in stretch backports and if you want to provide bart also on stable systems I'd recommend to do an official backport (just ping me if the version you prefer has hit testing and I'll do an upload to stretch-backports). Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional information and tell me what you want me to sponsor. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
Hi Martin, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:43:43PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > Thank you Andreas! Thanks to you for the preparation. ;-) > I had to include some bug fixes and also turned off some > unit tests because of build failures on some archs. > Can I ask for another upload? (see other mail) > The failing unit tests should not affect any functionality > currently exposed to the user. Still, it would be better > to be able to investigate this further. Is there a way > to get access to machines using these architectures? There are developer machines for every architecture. The procedure for non-DDs is to write an e-mail to the admins and get a signature from a DD. I admit I always forget where this procedure is described - hopefully its not to hard to find this information by web search (or maybe someone has a more detailed hint here?) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
I have another question: Would it be ok to use a dependency on debhelper (>=10) instead of (>=11~) ? Then the package could be build on stable without changes. Best, Martin Am Dienstag, den 11.12.2018, 22:43 +0100 schrieb Martin Uecker: > Thank you Andreas! > > I had to include some bug fixes and also turned off some > unit tests because of build failures on some archs. > Can I ask for another upload? > > The failing unit tests should not affect any functionality > currently exposed to the user. Still, it would be better > to be able to investigate this further. Is there a way > to get access to machines using these architectures? > > Best, > Martin > > > Am Montag, den 10.12.2018, 16:21 +0100 schrieb Martin Uecker: > > Dear all, > > > > I prepared the new upstream version 0.4.04 of bart for upload. > > > > Can somebody please upload? Thank you! > > > > Best, > > Martin
Re: bart: version 0.4.04
Thank you Andreas! I had to include some bug fixes and also turned off some unit tests because of build failures on some archs. Can I ask for another upload? The failing unit tests should not affect any functionality currently exposed to the user. Still, it would be better to be able to investigate this further. Is there a way to get access to machines using these architectures? Best, Martin Am Montag, den 10.12.2018, 16:21 +0100 schrieb Martin Uecker: > Dear all, > > I prepared the new upstream version 0.4.04 of bart for upload. > > Can somebody please upload? Thank you! > > Best, > Martin
bart: version 0.4.04
Dear all, I prepared the new upstream version 0.4.04 of bart for upload. Can somebody please upload? Thank you! Best, Martin
