Bug#658959: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#658959: RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1

2012-02-07 Thread Boris Pek
Unfortuantly, I cannot find a link to the mailinglist archive for pkg-virtualbox-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#658992: RFS: cxxtest/4.0.3-1 [NEW] - lightweight xUnit-like framework for C/C++ applications

2012-02-07 Thread Simone Rossetto
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package cxxtest. CxxTest is a lightweight xUnit-like testing framework for C/C++ applications. Writing test is easier and simpler than others C/C++ testing frameworks because it is not required to

Packaging source from a git repository

2012-02-07 Thread Olе Streicher
Hi, I need create a package from a git repository (specifically libraries/sla from http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/starlink.git). What are the best options to do this? Best Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Hi, I fixed the error isues Could you please sponser a upload? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc Van: Bas van den Dikkenberg Verzonden: maandag 6 februari 2012 16:08 Aan: 'Bartosz Feński' CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: RE: RFS: burp -- A cross

Re: Packaging source from a git repository

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Olе Streicher wrote: I need create a package from a git repository (specifically libraries/sla from http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/starlink.git). What are the best options to do this? One of the following in decreasing preference: Ask upstream to perform

RFS: burp - backup and restore program

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package burp. * Package name: burp Version : 1.3.0-4 Upstream Author : Graham Keeling keel...@spamcop.net * URL : http://burp.grke.net/ * License : AGPLv3 Section : utils It builds those binary

debexpo raising files changed and insertion errors on vera++ package

2012-02-07 Thread Vincent Hobeïka
Dear mentors, Prior to submitting a standard RFS I wanted to clean my package[1] to the most. It seems my package is clean. Lintian raises no warning, debuild builds the package successfully. However debexpo[2] raises strange errors regarding files changed and insertions

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Yes i did they use the AGPLv3 license and it states in de copyright file: Linking: As a special exception to the AGPLv3, the Burp Project gives permission to link the code of its release of Burp with the OpenSSL project's OpenSSL library (or with modified versions of it that use the same

Bug#658900: marked as done (RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] -- Minimalistic C client library for Redis)

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:25:32 +0100 with message-id 20120207132532.ge4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at and subject line Re: Bug#658900: RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] -- Minimalistic C client library for Redis has caused the Debian Bug report #658900, regarding RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] --

Bug#658772: Updated the packes

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To fix some isues addressed bye a mentor I have uploaded an updated version without lintian errors. Can you please upload. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp

Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bartosz Feński
W dniu 07.02.2012 13:43, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Hi, I fixed the error isues Could you please sponser a upload? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc Did you contacted upstream about that SSL linking and this is their statement that you put

Bug#658902: marked as done (RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA] -- command line interface to X selections)

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:33:17 +0100 with message-id 20120207133317.gf4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at and subject line Re: Bug#658902: RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA] -- command line interface to X selections has caused the Debian Bug report #658902, regarding RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA]

Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bartosz Feński
W dniu 07.02.2012 14:22, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Yes i did they use the AGPLv3 license and it states in de copyright file: Linking: As a special exception to the AGPLv3, the Burp Project gives permission to link the code of its release of Burp with the OpenSSL project's OpenSSL

Re: debexpo raising files changed and insertion errors on vera++ package

2012-02-07 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote: [1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc [2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file but no debian.tar.gz. -- Stephen M. Webb

Re: debexpo raising files changed and insertion errors on vera++ package

2012-02-07 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote: [1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc [2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file but no debian.tar.gz. -- Stephen M. Webb

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Thanks for the tip, i corrected the changelog and uploaded a new version Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl] Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 14:35 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Martí
Also, might I ask why are there three changelog entries? Or has there been *three* uploads in a two day period? Cheers!

Re: debexpo raising files changed and insertion errors on vera++ package

2012-02-07 Thread Gergely Nagy
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes: On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote: [1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc [2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file

Processed: retitle 658959 to RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1/7-1 [NEW] -- web based interface for administering virtualbox ...

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 658959 RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1/7-1 [NEW] -- web based interface for administering virtualbox Bug #658959 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1/7-1 [NEW] -- web based interface for

Processed: retitle 658772 to RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP]

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 658772 RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP] Bug #658772 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program. Changed Bug title to 'RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP]'

Bug#658835: RFS: aspsms-t (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport for your xmpp/jabber server

2012-02-07 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
tag 658835 + moreinfo thanks Hi, I have no intention of sponsoring this package, but as I did take a brief look at it before: | my $config_file = /home/jabber/aspsms-t/etc/aspsms-web-notify.xml; Not really useful for programs in /usr/bin. | use lib ./; Not really useful for programs in

Processed: Re: Bug#658835: RFS: aspsms-t (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport for your xmpp/jabber server

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 658835 + moreinfo Bug #658835 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: aspsms-t (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport for your xmpp/jabber server Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658835:

RFS: policyd-weight

2012-02-07 Thread Werner Detter
Hi everybody, as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody that uploads the package for me. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License :

Bug#658900: RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] -- Minimalistic C client library for Redis

2012-02-07 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:25:32PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:08:50 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package hiredis, since my previous sponsor is not responding to my emails. Uploaded, thanks for your quick bugfixes. Thanks.

Bug#658902: RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA] -- command line interface to X selections

2012-02-07 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:33:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:14:57 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the package xclip. Uploaded, thanks for your work. Thanks. Cheers -- perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Three uploads, The initial, the one you gave some comments. Today a second one, then I notisid that there was no watch file so created one en uploaded a new version. Bas Van: Daniel Martí [mailto:danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 15:04 Aan: Bas van den

gobject-introspection’s .typelib files and Multi-Arch

2012-02-07 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Good morning mentors, I’m in the process of packaging a GObject–based library[1] which provides gobject-introspection support. While preparing the gir1.2- package I stumbled upon the gobject-introspection mini–policy[2] and found out that .typelib files are supposed to be installed in the

Re: RFS: v8cgi (second try)

2012-02-07 Thread Ondřej Žára
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Ondřej Žára ondrej.z...@gmail.com wrote: v8cgi itself is implemented in C++ and has libv8 as its only dependency. It is developed at Google Code (http://code.google.com/p/v8cgi/) under New BSD Licence. Ubuntu packages are available from a Launchpad PPA

Re: debexpo raising files changed and insertion errors on vera++ package

2012-02-07 Thread Vincent Hobeïka
Thank you for your quick answers, Andrey Rahmatullin (wRAR) told me on #debexpo to ignore this message. Yet, I have added the debian/source/format file and the errors have disappeared. Thanks a lot for your help. -- Vincent Hobeïka This message and any attachments are the property of The

why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Elliott
If I look at my package thru debian packaging: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open. However the changelog file contains a entry like this: . libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #635672) 635672 is

Re: why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 07/02/12 16:59, Paul Elliott a écrit : If I look at my package thru debian packaging: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open. However the changelog file contains a entry like this: . libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable; urgency=low

Re: why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 07.02.2012 17:11, schrieb Thibaut Paumard: Why does packaging not see this? Have I made a mistake? Was this initial version actually uploaded to the Debian archive? .. or the uploaded package build with -v to include older changelog entries? Best regards, Alexander -- To

Re: why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com, 2012-02-07, 09:59: If I look at my package thru debian packaging: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open. However the changelog file contains a entry like this: . libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable;

Re: why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:59, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: If I look at my package thru debian packaging: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open. However the changelog file contains a entry like this: . libswe

Re: why does debian packaging think ITP is still open?

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: what is the status of an orphaned package but that is waiting for an sponsor to be uploaded ? Thanks, Jerome On 07/02/12 16:59, Paul Elliott wrote: If I look at my package thru debian packaging: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html It thinks my ITP #635672 is still

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, NMU for package goplay is looking for a sponsor. (See attached debdiff output) # GoPlay! is a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that uses DebTags for easily finding games in Debian. The program uses FLTK for handling the widgets,

questions about database installations

2012-02-07 Thread Nikolai Lusan
Greetings, Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the database installation and configuration, however when I did an RFS the sponsor pulled it all

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 659045 +wontfix thanks On 07.02.2012 17:58, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: NMU for package goplay is looking for a sponsor. (See attached debdiff output) ... + compat and debhelper to version 9 + default hardening (with the exception of fortify) +

Processed: Re: Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 659045 +wontfix Bug #659045 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: goplay (NMU) Added tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 659045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659045 Debian

RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg. * Package name: rpg Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpg/ * License

Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg. * Package name: rpg Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com * URL :

Re: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Bas, On 07.02.2012 19:02, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg. please do not send out both, a RFS bug against the sponsorship-package and a traditional RFS mail to debian-mentors. For now, you may

Re: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, * Package name: rpg * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpg/ [...] rpg - Readable Password Generator Does this offer anything over password generators already in Debian such as pwgen, apg or gpw? Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RE: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
It is easy to customize with config file, I find this password very good and better then the other 3 you mentiond. For example you can exclude letters and numbers that look like each other. Just like name says it make your password Readable -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ansgar

sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

2012-02-07 Thread Boris Pek
Hi everyone, Continuing the theme of excessive noise in the mailing list, we can look at simple statistics for the first 7 days of this month: $ curl -q http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2 /dev/null | \ grep 'listrong' | wc -l 191 $ curl

Re: sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

2012-02-07 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07.02.2012 19:56, Boris Pek wrote: I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good reason to filter these messages? Try your luck: #658498 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID:

Re: sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

2012-02-07 Thread Boris Pek
 I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good  reason to filter these messages? Try your luck: #658498 I haven't seen it. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

RE: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Oke , Won't do that again, my idea was tathe was the correct procedure. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Arno Töll [mailto:deb...@toell.net] Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 19:23 Aan: Debian Mentors; Bas van den Dikkenberg Onderwerp: Re: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

Re: Fwd: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

2012-02-07 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote: I will try to look sometime soon, but can't promise when. Hello Samuel The gcc-doc thing you've done looks great, however it is incomplete. Complete solution consists of gcc-doc-defaults package [contrib], and

Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bartosz Feński
W dniu 07.02.2012 15:51, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Three uploads, The initial, the one you gave some comments. Today a second one, then I notisid that there was no watch file so created one en uploaded a new version. Did you try to build it under pbuilder/cowbuilder? I tried, without

Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Richard Laager
What advantages does this program have over pwgen (which has been around for a long time and is already package)? -- Richard signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl] Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 21:20 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: Daniel Martí; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program. W dniu 07.02.2012 15:51, Bas van den Dikkenberg

Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-02-07 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Richard Laager [mailto:rlaa...@wiktel.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 21:26 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg; 659...@bugs.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator What advantages does this program have over pwgen

Fwd: phpldapadmin uploaded to mentors.debian.net

2012-02-07 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Dear Fabio, I've noted, that the debian package phpldapadmin is out of date compared to upstream. The recent squeeze implementation of openldap uses the cn=config scheme which is supported in newer upstream versions (compared to the debian version which is 1.2.0.5). I've created a debian

Re: Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Arno, On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 04:10:48 Arno Töll wrote: + compat and debhelper to version 9 + default hardening (with the exception of fortify) + standards to 3.9.2 + ept-cache replaced with apt-xapian-index in Depends We don't do such things in NMUs. *Sometimes* we do. The options

Bug#658936: RFS: apt-build/0.12.42 [QA] -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages

2012-02-07 Thread D. Lasserre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I have made a few other changes to apt-build, please view changelog: apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low * QA upload. * Bump source format to 3.0 (native). * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859. * Allow

Re: questions about database installations

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the database installation and configuration,

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:10:55AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit : The options are: * QA : Not in this case since the package is team-maintained. * Team : Looks like best option, but I'm not the team member

Re: sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
I think proposal regarding managing sponsorship through bug tracker was to encourage usage of bug tracker. To me forwarding BTS activity for sponsorship-requests to mentors mail list appears to be against the spirit and the desire of the proposal. Indeed we should encourage people to

Re: questions about database installations

2012-02-07 Thread Toni Mueller
On 02/08/2012 02:12 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote: Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the

Re: questions about database installations

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Toni Mueller wrote: Of course I can. I have just forwarded you (Paul) the mail exchange pertaining to that case that should shed some light on the initial problems, but the gist of it is that I could not get the dbconfig-common stuff to run reliably, while the

sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored. Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted: a kind of limbo status. Thanks. hth,

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Charles, have you actually tried to contact the team ? I do not see messages from you in January or February on their mailing list. I did just before I noticed this message of yours, but I wrote to them after I placed the sponsorship request. :( Probably that's wasn't the best choice

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Charles, On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:51:19 Charles Plessy wrote: have you actually tried to contact the team ? I do not see messages from you in January or February on their mailing list. How could I forget, I did contact them thought the Alioth request to join the team, where I mention the

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored. To say the least. Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Michael Gilbert
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted: a kind of limbo status. Do you mean something like: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned_byage Anyone can adopt

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:36:08PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit : How could I forget, I did contact them thought the Alioth request to join the team, where I mention the prepared NMU. Alioth requests are a mess: when one admin answers, there is no notification to the other admins. As a

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Dean Evans
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:28:52 +0100 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote: Hello List: I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored. Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed

Bug#659045: RFS: goplay (NMU)

2012-02-07 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Hi Charles, On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:51:42 Charles Plessy wrote: Alioth requests are a mess: when one admin answers, there is no notification to the other admins. As a consequence, it can happen that everyone expects the others to have answered. I recommend to contact the team on its mailing

sponsorship-requests and status

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored. Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted: a kind of limbo status. Thanks. hth,

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote: Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted: a kind of limbo status. Do you mean something like:

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Dean Evans
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:40:40 +0100 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote: Hello List: On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote: Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact it is indeed orphaned, but also on

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi ! On 08/02/12 05:04, Dean Evans wrote: On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:40:40 +0100 Jerome BENOITg62993...@rezozer.net wrote: Hello List: On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote: Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned, it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact

Bug#659078: RFS: auralquiz/0.8-1 [NEW] -- simple music quiz game using your own music files

2012-02-07 Thread Dean Evans
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package auralquiz: Package name: auralquiz Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Jan Kusanagi janjab...@gmail.com URL : https://jancoding.wordpress.com/category/projects/auralquiz/

Re: sponsorship-requests and orphaned status

2012-02-07 Thread Dean Evans
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:13:58 +0100 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote: You should use the existing wnpp bug report #525921 to state your intention to adopt instead of creating a new one. Please add a note to #525921 that you are intending to adopt the package, retitle it from O:

Re: Bug#658498: sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

2012-02-07 Thread Alexander Wirt
Dmitry Smirnov schrieb am Wednesday, den 08. February 2012: I think proposal regarding managing sponsorship through bug tracker was to encourage usage of bug tracker. To me forwarding BTS activity for sponsorship-requests to mentors mail list appears to be against the spirit and the

Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

2012-02-07 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nestopia. * Package name: nestopia Version : 1.40h+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Martin Freij and R. Belmont * URL : http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/?page_id=200 *

Bug#659083: RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game

2012-02-07 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xmoto. The changelog is as follows: xmoto (0.5.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (closes: #644234): + builds with libpng 1.5 (closes: #649797); + uses libxml2;

Processed: retitle 659082 to RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 659082 RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System Bug #659082 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System Changed Bug

Processed: block 559563 with 659082

2012-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 559563 with 659082 Bug #559563 [wnpp] ITP: nestopia -- advanced emulator for the Nintento Entertainment System Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 559563: 659082 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you