Bug#834567: marked as done (RFS: gxmessage/3.4.3-1 [QA upload])

2016-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:26:24 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gxmessage/3.4.3-1 [QA upload] has caused the Debian Bug report #834567, regarding RFS: gxmessage/3.4.3-1 [QA upload] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1

2016-08-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:24:31PM +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote: > On 2016-08-18 at 21:48:05 +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: FYI: no need to explicitly CC d-mentors@, RFSes are somehow sent there anyway. > > To access further

Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1

2016-08-18 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi
On 2016-08-18 at 21:48:05 +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/codicefiscale > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > >

Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1

2016-08-18 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codicefiscale" * Package name: codicefiscale Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Emanuele Rocca * URL : https://github.com/ema/pycodicefiscale * License

Bug#834759: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.5-1

2016-08-18 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 18 August 2016 at 19:11, Christoph Mathys wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-keyring" > > * Package name: mercurial-keyring > Version : 1.1.5-1 > Upstream

Bug#834759: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.5-1

2016-08-18 Thread Christoph Mathys
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-keyring" * Package name: mercurial-keyring Version : 1.1.5-1 Upstream Author : Marcin Kasperski * URL :

Re: Problems building latest phyml

2016-08-18 Thread Stephane Guindon
Hi Andreas (et al.), Thanks for all this. I've made a few very dirty commit early on this summer and hoping to clean up all this sometime in Septembre. It might be a good idea to wait until to build a Debian package for PhyML... Regards, -Stephane- On 17/08/2016 16:33, Andreas Tille

Bug#834313: RFS: dh-text/1.0 ITP

2016-08-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 08:51 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > >There's a typo in the man page patch (standa instead of stanza). The typo got fixed after he uploaded the patch. > It's good to have this function in the core, but doesn't that exclude > backports? There were dpkg backports in the

Bug#834313: RFS: dh-text/1.0 ITP

2016-08-18 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Paul Wise writes: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> That sounds like the best option. I've pointed the dpkg maintainer at >> your mail on IRC and asked for their thoughts on the matter. > > Guillem got enthusiastic about this and came up with this patch: >