Re: package pynmea2

2017-11-14 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already > exists. > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html > > I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with > an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he

Bug#881762: ITA: gtkterm/0.99.7~rc1-1

2017-11-14 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:19:27PM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote: > * Package name: gtkterm > Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1 > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] > Section

Bug#881762: ITA: gtkterm/0.99.7~rc1-1

2017-11-14 Thread Willem van den Akker
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkterm" * Package name: gtkterm Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL

Re: package pynmea2

2017-11-14 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi Geert Stappers, > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. >> But python-nmea2 already exists. >> >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html >> >> I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with >> an

Re: package pynmea2

2017-11-14 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Hi, > > There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. > But python-nmea2 already exists. > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html > > I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with > an n-d...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#858155: marked as done (RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP])

2017-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #858155, regarding RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#871468: marked as done (RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol)

2017-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:01 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol has caused the Debian Bug report #871468, regarding RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] --

Re: How to determine the filename for dlopen()

2017-11-14 Thread Ferenc W√°gner
Christian Seiler writes: > Am 2017-11-13 13:23, schrieb wf...@niif.hu: > >> I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds >> this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine >> the filename to use in the dlopen() call? It

package pynmea2

2017-11-14 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already exists. https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org to ITP only. RFS still open.

Re: source package upload fail? Bug - #859130 ITP: lina -- iso- Forth interpreter

2017-11-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
>Sorry to have bothered you. All answers are in >https://mentors.debian.net/qa I'm quite busy right now, good luck with mentors uploads :) G.

Re: ZFS packaging

2017-11-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
>Would it be possible to have someone look over the changes I've made >and/or make suggestions as to how I could get these changes incorporated >into Debian? it is usually better to open wishlist bugs for improvements (with patches) and then in case open an RFS bug. Looks the new release is

Bug#880049: marked as done (RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing to update the bpo])

2017-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:24:09 + (UTC) with message-id <124788531.3381894.1510665849...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#880049: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing to update the bpo] has caused the Debian Bug report #880049, regarding RFS:

Bug#880443: marked as done (RFS: spyder-reports/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2017-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:38:05 + with message-id <0f1add24-c3b5-e01a-d2d3-9172f90ae...@visulytix.com> and subject line uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #880443, regarding RFS: spyder-reports/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that