packages with kernel version dependencies

1999-07-07 Thread tony mancill
Greetings mentors, I maintain the wanpipe package, which is a set of utilities for use with Sangoma WAN router cards. The binaries have to be compiled with a certain version of the kernel. Moreover, the kernel patches required for the drivers are not part of 2.0.36 or 2.0.37 (the package

Re: dblibs

1999-07-07 Thread Kermit Tensmeyer
Jim == Jim Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jim Hi, this has questions for mentors and the mentee. Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:03:54 CDT To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org From: Kermit Tensmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dblibs Can someone explain to me, the hows and

exec ./configure ${1+$@}

1999-07-07 Thread Sami Dalouche
I've seen this line in the dh_configure file of the mutt package and I'm asking some questions about this : 1 ) Is the exec necessary ? What does it stand for ? 2 ) What's the ${1+$@} the ${} means that it will be replaced by the output of the command inside but what's the 1+$@ ?

Re: ATerm package

1999-07-07 Thread Joseph Carter
/* * Redirecting to -mentors */ On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 05:01:12PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 1999, chris mckillop wrote: Since it tends to use more colors, I think I'll create two binaries (does anyone object aterm-fade ?), a bit like there is rxvt and rxvt-xpm. This

Re: ATerm package

1999-07-07 Thread Samuel Hocevar
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 05:01:12PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote: Since it tends to use more colors, I think I'll create two binaries (does anyone object aterm-fade ?), a bit like there is rxvt and rxvt-xpm. I'll have to have a look at how it has

Re: ATerm package

1999-07-07 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 07:24:47PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote: Well, here is what I did; I hacked debian/rules so that: o it first builds aterm with --enable-fading; o it moves 'aterm' to 'aterm-fade'; o it eventually builds the classic aterm. debclean now runs $(MAKE) distclean but